Citations per year, relative to L. Karl Branting L. Karl Branting (= 1×)
peers
Cunchao Tu
Countries citing papers authored by L. Karl Branting
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of L. Karl Branting's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Karl Branting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Karl Branting more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by L. Karl Branting
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Karl Branting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Karl Branting. The network helps show where L. Karl Branting may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. Karl Branting
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. Karl Branting.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. Karl Branting based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with L. Karl Branting. L. Karl Branting is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Alexander, Charlotte, et al.. (2021). Does Lawyering Matter? Predicting Judicial Decisions from Legal Briefs, and What That Means for Access to Justice. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Branting, L. Karl, et al.. (2017). Cognitive Assistance for Administrative Adjudication.. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 134–140.1 indexed citations
7.
Branting, L. Karl. (2008). Techniques for Automated Drafting of Judicial Documents. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
8.
Branting, L. Karl. (2006). Efficient Name Variation Detection.. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 8–13.
9.
Mott, Bradford, James C. Lester, & L. Karl Branting. (2005). The Role of Syntactic Analysis in Textual Case Retrieval.. 120–127.3 indexed citations
10.
Rissland, Edwina L., Kevin Ashley, & L. Karl Branting. (2005). Case-based reasoning and law. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 20(3). 293–298.35 indexed citations
Branting, L. Karl. (2002). Name-Matching Algorithms for Legal Case-Management Systems.. Journal of information, law and technology. 2002.10 indexed citations
14.
Ashley, Kevin D., L. Karl Branting, Howard Margolis, & Cass R. Sunstein. (2001). Legal Reasoning and Artificial Intelligence: How Computers "Think" Like Lawyers. 8(1). 2.2 indexed citations
15.
Branting, L. Karl, et al.. (2001). CARMA: A Case-Based Range Management Advisor. Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 3–10.6 indexed citations
16.
Weber, Rosina O., et al.. (2000). Active Case-Based Reasoning for Lessons Delivery System. The Florida AI Research Society. 170–174.12 indexed citations
Branting, L. Karl & David W. Aha. (1995). Stratified case-based reasoning: reusing hierarchical problem solving episodes. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 384–390.33 indexed citations
19.
Broos, Patrick S. & L. Karl Branting. (1994). Compositional instance-based learning. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 651–656.2 indexed citations
20.
Branting, L. Karl & Bruce Porter. (1991). Rules and precedents as complementary warrants. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 3–9.36 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.