L. J. Dordelly
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 2%
- Physiology top 10%
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Bartolomé R. CelliClaudia CôtéVíctor Pinto-PlataJosé M. Marı́nCiro CasanovaHafida NekachShefali ModyMarya D. Zilberberg
- Topics
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (8 papers)Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (7 papers)Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Issues, ethics and legal aspectsPulmonary and Respiratory MedicineComplementary and alternative medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainVenezuela
In The Last Decade
L. J. Dordelly
8 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 974
- Physiology 334
- Complementary and alternative medicine 161
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 110
- General Health Professions 73
Countries citing papers authored by L. J. Dordelly
This map shows the geographic impact of L. J. Dordelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. J. Dordelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. J. Dordelly more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by L. J. Dordelly
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. J. Dordelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. J. Dordelly. The network helps show where L. J. Dordelly may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. J. Dordelly
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. J. Dordelly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. J. Dordelly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L. J. Dordelly. L. J. Dordelly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53 | |
| 2 | 96 | |
| 3 | 92 | |
| 4 | 202 | |
| 5 | 196 | |
| 6 | 187 | |
| 7 | 157 | |
| 8 | 131 |
About L. J. Dordelly
L. J. Dordelly is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Complementary and alternative medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (8 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (7 papers) and Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (60 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (974 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (161 citations). L. J. Dordelly has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Venezuela. Frequent co-authors include Bartolomé R. Celli, Claudia Côté, Víctor Pinto-Plata, José M. Marı́n, Ciro Casanova, Hafida Nekach, Shefali Mody, Marya D. Zilberberg, María Montes de and Juan P. de‐Torres. Their work appears in journals such as CHEST Journal, European Respiratory Journal and Respiratory Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.