L. F. Foreman

870 total citations
19 papers, 329 citations indexed

About

L. F. Foreman is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Economics and Econometrics and Agronomy and Crop Science. According to data from OpenAlex, L. F. Foreman has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 329 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 3 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 2 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science. Recurrent topics in L. F. Foreman's work include Agricultural Economics and Policy (12 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (4 papers) and Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (3 papers). L. F. Foreman is often cited by papers focused on Agricultural Economics and Policy (12 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (4 papers) and Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (3 papers). L. F. Foreman collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. L. F. Foreman's co-authors include Dayton M. Lambert, Patrick J. Sullivan, Roger Claassen, William D. McBride, Catherine M. Greene, Erik Dohlman, Michelle Da Pra, Birgit Meade, Constanza Valdés and Linwood A. Hoffman and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Land Use Policy and Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

In The Last Decade

L. F. Foreman

15 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

L. F. Foreman
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 129
  • Economics and Econometrics 118
  • Plant Science 95
  • Global and Planetary Change 57
  • Soil Science 43
Replace Fuduo Li with:
Fuduo Li China
Amaia Albizua Spain
Jyrki Niemi Finland
Joachim Aurbacher Germany
Meike Weltin Germany
Don E. Ethridge United States
David Raitzer Philippines
Klaus Droppelmann United States
Noel Russell United Kingdom
Klaus Mittenzwei Norway
Fuduo Li China View profile →
Citations per field, relative to L. F. Foreman
L. F. Foreman · 1×
Citations per year, relative to L. F. Foreman
L. F. Foreman · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by L. F. Foreman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. F. Foreman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. F. Foreman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. F. Foreman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. F. Foreman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. F. Foreman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. F. Foreman. The network helps show where L. F. Foreman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. F. Foreman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. F. Foreman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. F. Foreman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L. F. Foreman. L. F. Foreman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 2
3 9
4 34
5 41
6 5
7 1
8
Feed Grains Backgrounder
2
9 0
10 1
11 10
12 0
13
Bowel cancer screening--a role for general practice.
7
14 25
15 115
16 62
17 5
18 2
19 8

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026