Anna Geraedts

2.5k citations
17 papers · 706 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Geraedts

17 papers receiving 673 citations

Peers

Anna Geraedts
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Applied Psychology 241
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 249
  • Clinical Psychology 300
  • Social Psychology 200
  • Pharmacology 97
Replace Morgen A. R. Kelly with:
Morgen A. R. Kelly United States
Pål Ulvenes Norway
Victoria Beckner United States
Adoración Castro Spain
Leila Shahabi United States
Ahmad Borjali Iran
Paolo Grandinetti Italy
Ajeng J. Puspitasari United States
Tuva Øktedalen Norway
Wouter van Ballegooijen Netherlands
Anna Geraedts relative to Morgen A. R. Kelly United States Morgen A. R. Kelly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Morgen A. R. Kelly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Geraedts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Geraedts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Geraedts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Geraedts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Geraedts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Geraedts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Geraedts. The network helps show where Anna Geraedts may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Geraedts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Geraedts Line = papers co-authored together Anna Geraedts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 20209
2 20204
3 20199
4 20197
5 20192
6 201843
7 201754
8 201523
9 201512
10 20148
11 201471
12 201439
13 201415
14 201311
15 2011318
16
Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Depression
20119
17 201072

About Anna Geraedts

Anna Geraedts is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Medical Laboratory Technology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 17 papers that have together received 706 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (8 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (7 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (7 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Stress and Burnout Research (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (241 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (249 citations), Clinical Psychology (300 citations), Social Psychology (200 citations) and Pharmacology (97 citations). Anna Geraedts has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Pim Cuijpers, Gerhard Andersson, Annemieke van Straten, John C. Markowitz, Patricia van Oppen, Willem van Mechelen, Annet Kleiboer, Noortje Wiezer, Jos W. R. Twisk and Irma M. Verdonck‐de Leeuw. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Archives of Suicide Research, American Journal of Psychiatry and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026