L. D. Pryor
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Co-authors
- L. A. S. JohnsonR. R. WillingGA ChilversI. K. FergusonRudolf SchmidR. B. KnoxER WilliamsG. E. Wickens
- Topics
- Forest ecology and management (16 papers)Plant Diversity and Evolution (15 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
L. D. Pryor
35 papers receiving 598 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Plant Science 360
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 344
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 333
- Molecular Biology 196
- Cell Biology 118
Countries citing papers authored by L. D. Pryor
This map shows the geographic impact of L. D. Pryor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. D. Pryor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. D. Pryor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by L. D. Pryor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. D. Pryor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. D. Pryor. The network helps show where L. D. Pryor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. D. Pryor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. D. Pryor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. D. Pryor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L. D. Pryor. L. D. Pryor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 37 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | A report on the selection and establishment of tree species suitable for pole and fuel wood plantations in Lesotho. | 2 |
| 7 | Variation and taxonomy in Eucalyptus camaldulensis. | 21 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | A report on past performance and some current aspects of the cultivation of quick-growing species (mainly Eucalyptus) in India. | 2 |
| 11 | 68 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | Trees in Canberra | 2 |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | Variable resistance to leaf-eating insects in some eucalypts | 5 |
About L. D. Pryor
L. D. Pryor is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 38 papers that have together received 798 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (16 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (15 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (333 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (344 citations) and Forestry (40 citations). L. D. Pryor has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include L. A. S. Johnson, R. R. Willing, GA Chilvers, I. K. Ferguson, Rudolf Schmid, R. B. Knox, ER Williams, G. E. Wickens, JJ Burdon and D. M. PATON. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Theoretical and Applied Genetics and Annals of Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.