GA Chilvers
Impact in
- Plant Science top 1%
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance
- Plant Pathogens and Resistance
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 33
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance 13
- Plant Pathogens and Resistance 8
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 12
- Co-authors
- J. J. BurdonF. LapeyrieA. E. AshfordJJ BurdonJeremy J. BurdonMegan H. RyanL. D. PryorKathryn A. Thomas
- Journals
- New Phytologist (21 papers)Australian Journal of Botany (11 papers)Oecologia (6 papers)Annals of Applied Biology (2 papers)Nature (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
GA Chilvers
67 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Plant Science 1.7k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 465
- Insect Science 457
- Cell Biology 420
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 464
Countries citing papers authored by GA Chilvers
This map shows the geographic impact of GA Chilvers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by GA Chilvers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites GA Chilvers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by GA Chilvers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by GA Chilvers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by GA Chilvers. The network helps show where GA Chilvers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside GA Chilvers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 16 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 26 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 20 | |
| 6 | 1987 | 82 | |
| 7 | Ectomycorrhizal VS endomycorrhizal fungi within the same root system | 1987 | 10 |
| 8 | 1983 | 32 | |
| 9 | 1977 | 29 | |
| 10 | 1977 | 37 | |
| 11 | 1976 | 24 | |
| 12 | 1976 | 20 | |
| 13 | 1976 | 28 | |
| 14 | 1975 | 48 | |
| 15 | 1974 | 25 | |
| 16 | 1974 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1972 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1968 | 30 | |
| 19 | 1968 | 79 | |
| 20 | 1965 | 68 |
About GA Chilvers
GA Chilvers is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cell Biology and Insect Science, having authored 67 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (33 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (13 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (11 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (8 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (1.7k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (465 citations), Insect Science (457 citations), Cell Biology (420 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (464 citations). GA Chilvers has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. J. Burdon, F. Lapeyrie, A. E. Ashford, JJ Burdon, Jeremy J. Burdon, Megan H. Ryan, L. D. Pryor, Kathryn A. Thomas, J. L. HARLEY and Robert J. Seviour. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Australian Journal of Botany, Oecologia, Annals of Applied Biology and Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.