Kylie Bennett
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 0.5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
-
- Mental Health Research Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Papers in
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 40
-
- Mental Health Research Topics 15
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 6
- Co-authors
- Kathleen M GriffithsHelen ChristensenAmelia GulliverLouise M. FarrerAnthony BennettPhilip J. BatterhamAndrew MackinnonAlison L. Calear
- Journals
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (10 papers)BMC Psychiatry (6 papers)JMIR Mental Health (5 papers)Internet Interventions (4 papers)Trials (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Kylie Bennett
50 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Applied Psychology 1.1k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 573
- Clinical Psychology 865
- Social Psychology 685
- General Health Professions 504
Countries citing papers authored by Kylie Bennett
This map shows the geographic impact of Kylie Bennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kylie Bennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kylie Bennett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kylie Bennett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kylie Bennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kylie Bennett. The network helps show where Kylie Bennett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kylie Bennett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 27 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 71 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 41 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 34 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 85 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 135 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 106 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 192 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 96 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 56 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 117 |
About Kylie Bennett
Kylie Bennett is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (40 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (17 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (16 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (15 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (573 citations), Clinical Psychology (865 citations), Social Psychology (685 citations) and General Health Professions (504 citations). Kylie Bennett has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen M Griffiths, Helen Christensen, Amelia Gulliver, Louise M. Farrer, Anthony Bennett, Philip J. Batterham, Andrew Mackinnon, Alison L. Calear, Julia Reynolds and Jade KY Chan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, BMC Psychiatry, JMIR Mental Health, Internet Interventions and Trials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.