Jade KY Chan
About
In The Last Decade
Jade KY Chan
9 papers receiving 390 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Clinical Psychology 170
- Applied Psychology 169
- Social Psychology 112
- General Health Professions 95
- Sociology and Political Science 93
Countries citing papers authored by Jade KY Chan
This map shows the geographic impact of Jade KY Chan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jade KY Chan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jade KY Chan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jade KY Chan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jade KY Chan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jade KY Chan. The network helps show where Jade KY Chan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jade KY Chan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jade KY Chan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jade KY Chan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jade KY Chan. Jade KY Chan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 71 | |
| 5 | 38 | |
| 6 | 54 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 135 | |
| 9 | 15 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.