Kyle D. Doherty

461 citations
15 papers · 365 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Kyle D. Doherty

14 papers receiving 364 citations

Peers

Kyle D. Doherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Environmental Chemistry 147
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 284
  • Ecological Modeling 25
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 62
  • Ecology 68
Replace Lindsay P. Chiquoine with:
Lindsay P. Chiquoine United States
Burton K. Pendleton United States
Colin Tucker United States
Mandy L. Slate United States
Luciana Zedda Germany
Marina LaForgia United States
Rosario Fanlo Spain
Janice M. Glime United States
Magda Garbowski United States
Carlo Belfiore Italy
Kyle D. Doherty relative to Lindsay P. Chiquoine United States Lindsay P. Chiquoine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Lindsay P. Chiquoine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle D. Doherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle D. Doherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle D. Doherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle D. Doherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle D. Doherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle D. Doherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle D. Doherty. The network helps show where Kyle D. Doherty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Kyle D. Doherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle D. Doherty Line = papers co-authored together Kyle D. Doherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2015101
2 201557
3 201745
4 202228
5 201825
6 201721
7 201519
8 202017
9 202014
10 201713
11 201912
12 20217
13 20235
14
"Fire Moss" Cover and Function in Severely Burned Forests of the Western United States
20171
15 20250

About Kyle D. Doherty

Kyle D. Doherty is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecological Modeling, having authored 15 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lichen and fungal ecology (10 papers), Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (8 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (5 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (3 papers), Bryophyte Studies and Records (3 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Chemistry (147 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (284 citations), Ecological Modeling (25 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (62 citations) and Ecology (68 citations). Kyle D. Doherty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Anita J. Antoninka, Matthew A. Bowker, Troy E. Wood, Sasha C. Reed, Philip W. Ramsey, Nancy Collins Johnson, Bradley J. Butterfield, Sergio Velasco Ayuso, Rob Massatti and Peter Z. Fulé. Their work appears in journals such as Restoration Ecology, Plant and Soil, Land Degradation and Development, International Journal of Wildland Fire and Conservation Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact