Kurt De Wit
- Education top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jef VerhoevenDirk HeerweghBruno BrouckerLiudvika LeišytėJan ElenJelle MampaeyAndré VervoortAn Jacobs
- Topics
- Higher Education Governance and Development (15 papers)Higher Education Learning Practices (6 papers)Gender and Technology in Education (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsItaly
In The Last Decade
Kurt De Wit
35 papers receiving 353 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Education 172
- Political Science and International Relations 116
- Sociology and Political Science 80
- Gender Studies 73
- Information Systems 66
Countries citing papers authored by Kurt De Wit
This map shows the geographic impact of Kurt De Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kurt De Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kurt De Wit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kurt De Wit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kurt De Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kurt De Wit. The network helps show where Kurt De Wit may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kurt De Wit
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kurt De Wit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kurt De Wit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kurt De Wit. Kurt De Wit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 71 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Higher education for Public Value: a research agenda | 1 |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 60 | |
| 11 | Third enlargement program of the river Scheldt | 1 |
| 12 | Universiteiten in Europa in de 21e eeuw : netwerken in een veranderende samenleving | 10 |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | Overheid, hoger onderwijs en economie | 1 |
| 19 | Overheid, Hoger Onderwijs en Economie : ontwikkelingen in Nederland en Vlaanderen | 4 |
| 20 | Higher Education Policy of the European Union | 1 |
About Kurt De Wit
Kurt De Wit is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations and Gender Studies, having authored 37 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Higher Education Governance and Development (15 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (6 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (30 citations), Information Systems and Management (54 citations) and Gender Studies (73 citations). Kurt De Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jef Verhoeven, Dirk Heerwegh, Bruno Broucker, Liudvika Leišytė, Jan Elen, Jelle Mampaey, André Vervoort, An Jacobs, Peter Van Petegem and Jani Ursin. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Education, Engineering Geology and Studies in Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.