Countries citing papers authored by Krystyna Boratyńska
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Krystyna Boratyńska's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Krystyna Boratyńska with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Krystyna Boratyńska more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Krystyna Boratyńska
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Krystyna Boratyńska. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Krystyna Boratyńska. The network helps show where Krystyna Boratyńska may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Krystyna Boratyńska
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Krystyna Boratyńska.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Krystyna Boratyńska based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Krystyna Boratyńska. Krystyna Boratyńska is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Boratyńska, Krystyna, et al.. (2012). European geography of Alnus incana leaf variation. Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology. 147(3). 601–610.9 indexed citations
Sobierajska, Karolina, Krystyna Boratyńska, & Katarzyna Marcysiak. (2010). Variation of cone characters in Pinus mugo (Pinaceae) populations in the Giant Mountains (Karkonosze, Sudetes).. Dendrobiology. 63. 33–41.9 indexed citations
10.
Boratyński, Adam, et al.. (2009). Life span of needles of Pinus mugo Turra: effect of altitude and species origin.. Polish Journal of Ecology. 57(3). 567–572.5 indexed citations
11.
Boratyńska, Krystyna, et al.. (2009). Differences among three populations of Pinus uliginosa and their relation to P. sylvestris as expressed by the needle characters. Dendrobiology. 61. 37–46.14 indexed citations
12.
Boratyński, Adam, Krystyna Boratyńska, Małgorzata Mazur, & Katarzyna Marcysiak. (2007). Seed involucre variation in Carpinus betulus [Corylaceae] in Poland. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia s Botanica. 49(1). 103–111.4 indexed citations
Boratyńska, Krystyna, et al.. (2004). Pinus mugo Turra geographic differentiation based on needle characters. Dendrobiology. 51. 9–17.16 indexed citations
16.
Marcysiak, Katarzyna, Krystyna Boratyńska, & Miłosz A. Mazur. (2003). Variability of Pinus uliginosa cones from the peat-bog in Węgliniec. Dendrobiology. 49.8 indexed citations
17.
Boratyńska, Krystyna, et al.. (2003). Morphological characteristic of Pinus sylvestris L. in the Southernmost, isolated locality in the Sierra de Baza (S Spain) as expressed in the needle characters. Dendrobiology. 50.4 indexed citations
18.
Boratyńska, Krystyna. (2002). Needle variability of Pinus mugo Turra in the West Tatra Mts.. Dendrobiology. 48.6 indexed citations
19.
Boratyńska, Krystyna, et al.. (2000). Variability of Pinus uncinata Ramond ex DC as expressed in needle traits. Dendrobiology. 45. 7–16.16 indexed citations
20.
Boratyńska, Krystyna. (1994). Chromosome numbers of Polish brambles [Rubus L., Rosaceae] III. 39. 101–110.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.