Kreete Lüll

3.1k total citations
9 papers, 151 citations indexed

About

Kreete Lüll is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Reproductive Medicine and Immunology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kreete Lüll has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 151 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 3 papers in Immunology. Recurrent topics in Kreete Lüll's work include Gut microbiota and health (6 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers) and Reproductive System and Pregnancy (3 papers). Kreete Lüll is often cited by papers focused on Gut microbiota and health (6 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers) and Reproductive System and Pregnancy (3 papers). Kreete Lüll collaborates with scholars based in Estonia, Spain and Sweden. Kreete Lüll's co-authors include Elin Org, Oliver Aasmets, Andres Salumets, Andres Metspalu, Julio Plaza‐Díaz, Karl‐Heinz Herzig, Stephen Franks, Riikka K. Arffman, Juha S. Tapanainen and Signe Altmäe and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Kreete Lüll

9 papers receiving 149 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Kreete Lüll Estonia	6	86	49	37	24	23	9	151
Oliver Aasmets Estonia	7	107 1.2×	44 0.9×	20 0.5×	27 1.1×	14 0.6×	14	167
Nicole R. Jimenez United States	8	41 0.5×	14 0.3×	17 0.5×	6 0.3×	80 3.5×	14	122
Pierluigi Puca Italy	8	66 0.8×	5 0.1×	23 0.6×	11 0.5×	15 0.7×	21	165
Olajumoke Fadugba United States	7	25 0.3×	2 0.0×	31 0.8×	11 0.5×	9 0.4×	24	215
Jacob H. Elnaggar United States	6	46 0.5×	3 0.1×	7 0.2×	14 0.6×	51 2.2×	15	122
Marisa Goff United States	4	29 0.3×	4 0.1×	26 0.7×	5 0.2×	2 0.1×	5	114
Christina Y. Lee United States	6	93 1.1×	1 0.0×	29 0.8×	16 0.7×	64 2.8×	12	165
Violetta Florova United States	4	87 1.0×	4 0.1×	44 1.2×		43 1.9×	7	159
Heather M. Froggatt United States	5	53 0.6×	4 0.1×	35 0.9×	6 0.3×		6	147
Marcela L. Moreira Brazil	8	22 0.3×	14 0.3×	52 1.4×	3 0.1×	1 0.0×	13	133

Countries citing papers authored by Kreete Lüll

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kreete Lüll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kreete Lüll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kreete Lüll more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kreete Lüll

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kreete Lüll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kreete Lüll. The network helps show where Kreete Lüll may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kreete Lüll

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kreete Lüll. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kreete Lüll based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kreete Lüll. Kreete Lüll is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Migueles, Jairo H., Nerea M. Molina, Alberto Sola‐Leyva, et al.. (2024). Association of Accelerometer‐Determined Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior With the Gut Microbiome in Middle‐Aged Women: A Compositional Data Approach. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 34(7). e14689–e14689. 2 indexed citations

2.

Vargas, Eva, Kreete Lüll, Juan Torres Fontes, et al.. (2024). Gut microbiome in endometriosis: a cohort study on 1000 individuals. BMC Medicine. 22(1). 294–294. 15 indexed citations

3.

Salumets, Andres, et al.. (2023). O-030 Gut microbiome in endometriosis: a cohort study on 1000 individuals. Human Reproduction. 38(Supplement_1). 2 indexed citations

4.

Lüll, Kreete & Elin Org. (2023). Uterine Microbiome: Does the Sampling Technique Matter?. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. 41(5). 144–150. 2 indexed citations

5.

Aasmets, Oliver, et al.. (2022). Gut metagenome associations with extensive digital health data in a volunteer-based Estonian microbiome cohort. Nature Communications. 13(1). 869–869. 28 indexed citations

6.

Lüll, Kreete, et al.. (2022). Differences in microbial profile of endometrial fluid and tissue samples in women with in vitro fertilization failure are driven by Lactobacillus abundance. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 101(2). 212–220. 20 indexed citations

7.

Aasmets, Oliver, et al.. (2021). Using fecal immunochemical tubes for the analysis of the gut microbiome has the potential to improve colorectal cancer screening. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 19603–19603. 14 indexed citations

8.

Aasmets, Oliver, Kreete Lüll, Jennifer M. Lang, et al.. (2021). Machine Learning Reveals Time-Varying Microbial Predictors with Complex Effects on Glucose Regulation. mSystems. 6(1). 16 indexed citations

9.

Lüll, Kreete, Riikka K. Arffman, Alberto Sola‐Leyva, et al.. (2020). The Gut Microbiome in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Its Association with Metabolic Traits. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 106(3). 858–871. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact