Konrad Schnabel
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jens B. AsendorpfRainer BanseAnthony G. GreenwaldFritz OstendorfMichelangelo VianelloBrian A. NosekSriram NarayananMichela Schröder–Abé
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (13 papers)Personality Traits and Psychology (9 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers)
- Journals
- Personality and Individual DifferencesFrontiers in PsychiatryBritish Journal of Social Psychology
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Konrad Schnabel
20 papers receiving 512 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Sociology and Political Science 251
- Clinical Psychology 220
- Social Psychology 219
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 134
- Applied Psychology 114
Countries citing papers authored by Konrad Schnabel
This map shows the geographic impact of Konrad Schnabel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Konrad Schnabel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Konrad Schnabel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Konrad Schnabel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Konrad Schnabel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Konrad Schnabel. The network helps show where Konrad Schnabel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Konrad Schnabel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Konrad Schnabel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Konrad Schnabel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Konrad Schnabel. Konrad Schnabel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 80 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 22. The self-concept: new insights from implicit measurement procedures | 31 |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 84 | |
| 16 | 71 | |
| 17 | 53 | |
| 18 | 63 | |
| 19 | 73 | |
| 20 | [Carcinoma cervicis uteri stage O. Report on clinical experience]. | 3 |
About Konrad Schnabel
Konrad Schnabel is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (13 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (9 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (114 citations), Social Psychology (219 citations) and Clinical Psychology (220 citations). Konrad Schnabel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jens B. Asendorpf, Rainer Banse, Anthony G. Greenwald, Fritz Ostendorf, Michelangelo Vianello, Brian A. Nosek, Sriram Narayanan, Michela Schröder–Abé, Natarajan Sriram and Francesco Dentale. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Frontiers in Psychiatry and British Journal of Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.