KongFatt Wong‐Lin
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Xiao‐Jing WangGirijesh PrasadPhilip HolmesJosé M. Sánchez‐BornotYogesh Kumar MeenaHubert CecottiPhilip A. EckhoffVahab Youssofzadeh
- Topics
- Neural dynamics and brain function (45 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (18 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
KongFatt Wong‐Lin
85 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.6k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 427
- Artificial Intelligence 234
- Molecular Biology 204
- Psychiatry and Mental health 173
Countries citing papers authored by KongFatt Wong‐Lin
This map shows the geographic impact of KongFatt Wong‐Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by KongFatt Wong‐Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites KongFatt Wong‐Lin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by KongFatt Wong‐Lin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by KongFatt Wong‐Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by KongFatt Wong‐Lin. The network helps show where KongFatt Wong‐Lin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of KongFatt Wong‐Lin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of KongFatt Wong‐Lin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of KongFatt Wong‐Lin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with KongFatt Wong‐Lin. KongFatt Wong‐Lin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 66 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | Development of a computer-based clinical decision support tool for identifying individuals with different levels of cognitive impairment | 1 |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 52 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | Analysis of a biologically realistic model for saccade-countermanding tasks | 3 |
| 20 | A Recurrent Network Mechanism of Time Integration in Perceptual Decisionsbreakdown → | 660 |
About KongFatt Wong‐Lin
KongFatt Wong‐Lin is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 89 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (45 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (18 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.6k citations), General Decision Sciences (93 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (427 citations). KongFatt Wong‐Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Xiao‐Jing Wang, Girijesh Prasad, Philip Holmes, José M. Sánchez‐Bornot, Yogesh Kumar Meena, Hubert Cecotti, Philip A. Eckhoff, Vahab Youssofzadeh, Michael N. Shadlen and Redmond G O’Connell. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.