Koen Kessels

687 total citations
10 papers, 230 citations indexed

About

Koen Kessels is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Koen Kessels has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 230 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Oncology, 4 papers in Surgery and 4 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Koen Kessels's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (5 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (4 papers). Koen Kessels is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (5 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (4 papers). Koen Kessels collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. Koen Kessels's co-authors include Leon M.G. Moons, Peter D. Siersema, G. Johan A. Offerhaus, Miangela M. Laclé, Joost M.J. Geesing, Wouter H. de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel, Niels van Lelyveld, Frank ter Borg, B.W.M. Spanier and Yara Backes and has published in prestigious journals such as Gut, The American Journal of Gastroenterology and Heart.

In The Last Decade

Koen Kessels

10 papers receiving 227 citations

Peers

Koen Kessels

ONCOL

PRM

SURGE

PFM

CCM

Ryusuke Kato Japan

Maitham A. Moslim United States

Paul Rat France

Veronica Pezzella France

Yair Edden Israel

Yusuke Takehara Japan

Peter Wylie United Kingdom

Moniek Verstegen Netherlands

Narcis Zarnescu Romania

G Pagano Italy

Ryusuke Kato Japan

Koen Kessels

225 ×1.3

ONCOL

165 ×1.2

PRM

151 ×1.9

SURGE

64 ×1.7

PFM

6 ×0.2

CCM

Citations per year, relative to Koen Kessels Koen Kessels (= 1×) peers Ryusuke Kato

Countries citing papers authored by Koen Kessels

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Koen Kessels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Koen Kessels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Koen Kessels more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Koen Kessels

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Koen Kessels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Koen Kessels. The network helps show where Koen Kessels may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Koen Kessels

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Koen Kessels. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Koen Kessels based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Koen Kessels. Koen Kessels is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Backes, Yara, Sjoerd G. Elias, John N. Groen, et al.. (2017). The prognostic value of lymph node yield in the earliest stage of colorectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study. BMC Medicine. 15(1). 129–129. 24 indexed citations

2.

Backes, Yara, Wouter H. de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel, J. van Bergeijk, et al.. (2017). Risk for Incomplete Resection after Macroscopic Radical Endoscopic Resection of T1 Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Cohort Study. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 112(5). 785–796. 45 indexed citations

3.

Moons, Leon M.G., Joost M.J. Geesing, Miangela M. Laclé, et al.. (2017). Extent of unnecessary surgery for benign rectal polyps in the Netherlands. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 87(2). 562–570.e1. 20 indexed citations

4.

Kessels, Koen, et al.. (2017). Sending family history questionnaires to patients before a colonoscopy improves genetic counseling for hereditary colorectal cancer. Journal of Digestive Diseases. 18(6). 343–348. 8 indexed citations

5.

Kessels, Koen, Sjoerd G. Elias, Yara Backes, et al.. (2016). Endoscopic resection of high-risk T1 colorectal carcinoma prior to surgical resection has no adverse effect on long-term outcomes. Gut. 67(2). 284–290. 78 indexed citations

6.

Backes, Yara, Leon M.G. Moons, Marco Novelli, et al.. (2016). Diagnosis of T1 colorectal cancer in pedunculated polyps in daily clinical practice: a multicenter study. Modern Pathology. 30(1). 104–112. 10 indexed citations

7.

Oijen, Martijn G. van, Marcel Spanier, Hendrikus J.M. Pullens, et al.. (2015). 101 Endoscopic Resection of High-Risk T1 Colorectal Carcinoma Prior to Surgical Resection Has No Adverse Effect on Long-Term Outcomes. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 81(5). AB112–AB113. 8 indexed citations

8.

Kessels, Koen, Herma H. Fidder, Tom G.W. Letteboer, et al.. (2013). Adherence to Microsatellite Instability Testing in Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer Patients. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 56(7). 825–833. 6 indexed citations

9.

Kessels, Koen, Herma H. Fidder, Robin Timmer, et al.. (2012). Recording of family history is associated with colorectal cancer stage. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 25(4). 482–487. 6 indexed citations

10.

Kessels, Koen, et al.. (2006). Epicardial adipose tissue imaged by magnetic resonance imaging: an important risk marker of cardiovascular disease. Heart. 92(7). 962–962. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact