Mark F.J. Stolk
- Gastroenterology top 1%
- Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment 11
- Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment 8
- Surgery top 5%
- Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments 11
- Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments 6
-
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders 12
- Oncology top 10%
- Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms 9
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 5
-
- Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments 4
- Co-authors
- Karel J. van ErpecumG. P. van Berge HenegouwenErnst J. KuipersJan B.�M.�J. JansenPiero PortincasaSebastiaan A.C. van TuylWillem RenooijT. L. Peeters
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)Gastroenterology (5 papers)Hepatology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsItalyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark F.J. Stolk
52 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Gastroenterology 373
- Surgery 680
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 473
- Oncology 313
- Epidemiology 236
Countries citing papers authored by Mark F.J. Stolk
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark F.J. Stolk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark F.J. Stolk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark F.J. Stolk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark F.J. Stolk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark F.J. Stolk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark F.J. Stolk. The network helps show where Mark F.J. Stolk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark F.J. Stolk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 52 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 58 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 18 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 66 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 12 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 9 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 23 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 14 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 17 | |
| 19 | 1993 | 22 | |
| 20 | 1991 | 7 |
About Mark F.J. Stolk
Mark F.J. Stolk is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (12 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (11 papers), Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (9 papers), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (8 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (5 papers) and Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (373 citations), Surgery (680 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (473 citations). Mark F.J. Stolk has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Karel J. van Erpecum, G. P. van Berge Henegouwen, Ernst J. Kuipers, Jan B.�M.�J. Jansen, Piero Portincasa, Sebastiaan A.C. van Tuyl, Willem Renooij, T. L. Peeters, Wim P.M. Hopman and L. M. A. Akkermans. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.