Koen De Decker

1.0k citations
26 papers · 462 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Koen De Decker

25 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Koen De Decker
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 88
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 56
  • Small Animals 77
  • Emergency Medicine 52
  • Toxicology 20
Replace Ryan Rivosecchi with:
Ryan Rivosecchi United States
Pavla Pokorná Czechia
Maurice J. Ahsman Netherlands
Peter Garrett Australia
Todd W. Thomsen United States
Ayşe Baysal Türkiye
Başar Cander Türkiye
Fırat Bektaş Türkiye
Hülya Ulusoy Türkiye
Ahmed Elkalioubie France
Koen De Decker relative to Ryan Rivosecchi United States Ryan Rivosecchi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.6×
Ryan Rivosecchi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Koen De Decker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Koen De Decker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Koen De Decker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Koen De Decker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Koen De Decker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Koen De Decker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Koen De Decker. The network helps show where Koen De Decker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Koen De Decker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Koen De Decker Line = papers co-authored together Koen De Decker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200797
2 200586
3 200158
4 200343
5 200630
6 201222
7 201821
8 201612
9 201910
10 20239
11 20219
12 20049
13 20228
14 20038
15 20128
16
Piroxicam versus tenoxicam in spine surgery: a placebo controlled study.
20017
17 20236
18 20215
19 20194
20 20153

About Koen De Decker

Koen De Decker is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Reproductive Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 26 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (3 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (2 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (88 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (56 citations), Small Animals (77 citations), Emergency Medicine (52 citations) and Toxicology (20 citations). Koen De Decker has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Philippe G. Jorens, Paul Schepens, Werner Jacobs, Jan Cordonnier, H. Adriàensen, Guy Hans, M. Vercauteren, Paul Van Schil, Rudi De Paep and Anne Daper. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Anesthesia & Analgesia, European Journal of Pediatrics, European Journal of Anaesthesiology and Gynecologic Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact