P. Reper
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Epidemiology
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- A. VanderkelenL. DuinslaegerMichael PirsonArnaud BruyneelAlain D’hondtJérôme TackMaria Cecília Bueno Jayme GallaniC. Vandenvelde
- Topics
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (5 papers)Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (5 papers)Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPlastic & Reconstructive SurgeryIntensive Care Medicine
- Partner nations
- BelgiumSwitzerlandCanada
In The Last Decade
P. Reper
25 papers receiving 556 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 167
- Epidemiology 138
- Emergency Medicine 133
- Rehabilitation 84
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 68
Countries citing papers authored by P. Reper
This map shows the geographic impact of P. Reper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Reper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Reper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by P. Reper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Reper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Reper. The network helps show where P. Reper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. Reper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. Reper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. Reper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with P. Reper. P. Reper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Not only ICU workload and activities but also ICU quality indicators are influenced by the Covid-19 epidemic | 1 |
| 3 | 98 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 69 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 61 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 63 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About P. Reper
P. Reper is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Rehabilitation and Health Information Management, having authored 25 papers that have together received 577 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (5 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (5 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (133 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (68 citations) and Rehabilitation (84 citations). P. Reper has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Switzerland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include A. Vanderkelen, L. Duinslaeger, Michael Pirson, Arnaud Bruyneel, Alain D’hondt, Jérôme Tack, Maria Cecília Bueno Jayme Gallani, C. Vandenvelde, Jean‐Paul Pirnay and Gérald Pierard. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and Intensive Care Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.