Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Epidemiology and outcome of acute lung injury in European intensive care units
2004490 citationsPierre Damas et al.Intensive Care Medicineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Pierre Damas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pierre Damas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pierre Damas more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pierre Damas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pierre Damas. The network helps show where Pierre Damas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pierre Damas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pierre Damas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pierre Damas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Pierre Damas. Pierre Damas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rousseau, Anne‐Françoise, et al.. (2018). Highly standardized quadriceps dynamometry of critically ill adults at bedside: a step towards individualized rehabilitation.. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).7 indexed citations
Layios, Nathalie, Bernard Lambermont, Didier Ledoux, et al.. (2009). Usefulness of procalcitonin for the decision of antibiotic treatment in ICU patients. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).2 indexed citations
Wiesen, Patricia, Mehran Monchi, Bernard Dubois, Jean‐Charles Preiser, & Pierre Damas. (2007). Cascade high volume hemofiltration : Preliminary data in septic shock patients. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).2 indexed citations
12.
Detry, Olivier, Arnaud De Roover, Jean Delwaide, et al.. (2002). Liver transplant in Jehovah's witnesses. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
13.
Dubois, Emmanuelle, Monique Nys, Didier Ledoux, et al.. (2000). Intérêt de la procalcitonine dans le diagnostic des broncho-pneumonies liées au respirateur. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
14.
Laureys, Steven, Marie-Élisabeth Faymonville, Christian Degueldre, et al.. (2000). Brain function during vegetative state and after recovery: A lesional approach to the study of human consciousness. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
Nys, Monique, Pierre Damas, Didier Ledoux, et al.. (1996). Endotoxin levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and early diagnosis of acute bacterial pneumonia. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
Lamy, Maurice, et al.. (1991). Adult respiratory distress syndrome: local or systemic disease. Critical Care. 4(1).
20.
Lamy, Maurice, et al.. (1990). Why is our present therapy for adult respiratory distress syndrome so ineffective?. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.