KM Keys

768 total citations
10 papers, 547 citations indexed

About

KM Keys is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, KM Keys has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 547 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Genetics, 6 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in KM Keys's work include Forensic and Genetic Research (7 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (2 papers). KM Keys is often cited by papers focused on Forensic and Genetic Research (7 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (2 papers). KM Keys collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Croatia. KM Keys's co-authors include TR Moretti, Annette Baumstark, Bruce Budowle, JB Smerick, B Budowle, A. L. Brown, Tamyra R. Moretti, BW Koons, Bruce McCord and Ralph O. Allen and has published in prestigious journals such as Electrophoresis, Forensic Science International and Journal of Forensic Sciences.

In The Last Decade

KM Keys

10 papers receiving 493 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
KM Keys United States	10	378	339	84	53	38	10	547
Chantal J. Frégeau Canada	15	231 0.6×	336 1.0×	87 1.0×	52 1.0×	37 1.0×	26	513
JB Smerick United States	14	556 1.5×	515 1.5×	132 1.6×	52 1.0×	21 0.6×	14	785
A. Krätzer Switzerland	10	376 1.0×	455 1.3×	102 1.2×	23 0.4×	16 0.4×	25	569
Kazumasa Sekiguchi Japan	15	511 1.4×	499 1.5×	109 1.3×	21 0.4×	19 0.5×	68	668
Cydne Holt United States	17	666 1.8×	732 2.2×	227 2.7×	43 0.8×	27 0.7×	31	1.0k
R.M. Fourney Canada	9	474 1.3×	385 1.1×	76 0.9×	14 0.3×	18 0.5×	14	661
Andy Urquhart United Kingdom	13	501 1.3×	625 1.8×	87 1.0×	23 0.4×	16 0.4×	17	844
Robert C. Shaler United States	15	479 1.3×	325 1.0×	86 1.0×	27 0.5×	151 4.0×	38	704
David Van Hoofstat Belgium	10	239 0.6×	315 0.9×	114 1.4×	34 0.6×	25 0.7×	12	428
Natsuko Mizuno Japan	15	482 1.3×	465 1.4×	99 1.2×	20 0.4×	14 0.4×	64	641

Countries citing papers authored by KM Keys

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of KM Keys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by KM Keys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites KM Keys more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by KM Keys

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by KM Keys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by KM Keys. The network helps show where KM Keys may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of KM Keys

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of KM Keys. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of KM Keys based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with KM Keys. KM Keys is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Moretti, TR, et al.. (2001). Validation of Short Tandem Repeats (STRs) for Forensic Usage: Performance Testing of Fluorescent Multiplex STR Systems and Analysis of Authentic and Simulated Forensic Samples. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 46(3). 647–660. 173 indexed citations

Moretti, TR, et al.. (2001). Validation of STR Typing by Capillary Electrophoresis. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 46(3). 661–676. 50 indexed citations

Budowle, Bruce, et al.. (2000). The Presumptive Reagent Fluorescein for Detection of Dilute Bloodstains and Subsequent STR Typing of Recovered DNA. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 45(5). 1090–1092. 36 indexed citations

Budowle, Bruce, et al.. (2000). Genetic variation at nine short tandem repeat loci in Chamorros and Filipinos from Guam. Legal Medicine. 2(1). 26–30. 13 indexed citations

Budowle, Bruce, et al.. (1999). Population Data on the Thirteen CODIS Core Short Tandem Repeat Loci in African Americans, U.S. Caucasians, Hispanics, Bahamians, Jamaicans, and Trinidadians. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 44(6). 1277–1286. 169 indexed citations

Allen, Ralph O., et al.. (1998). Analysis of two multiplexed short tandem repeat systems using capillary electrophoresis with multiwavelength fluorescence detection. Electrophoresis. 19(1). 94–100. 21 indexed citations

Budowle, B, TR Moretti, KM Keys, BW Koons, & JB Smerick. (1997). Validation Studies of the CTT STR Multiplex System. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 42(4). 701–707. 23 indexed citations

Budowle, Bruce, JB Smerick, KM Keys, & TR Moretti. (1997). United States Population Data on the Multiplex Short Tandem Repeat Loci—HUMTHO1, TPOX, and CSF1PO—and the Variable Number Tandem Repeat Locus D1S80. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 42(5). 846–849. 22 indexed citations

Budowle, Bruce, et al.. (1996). Portuguese population data on the six short tandem repeat loci — CSF1PO, TPOX, THO1, D3S1358, VWA and FGA. Forensic Science International. 83(3). 229–235. 30 indexed citations

10.

Keys, KM, Bruce Budowle, Šimun Anđelinović, et al.. (1996). Northern and southern Croatian population data on seven PCR-based loci. Forensic Science International. 81(2-3). 191–199. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact