Klaus Steffen

1.1k citations
33 papers · 700 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Klaus Steffen

32 papers receiving 626 citations

Peers

Klaus Steffen
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Applied Mathematics 399
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 264
  • Mathematical Physics 123
  • Geometry and Topology 83
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 108
Replace Fumio Sakai with:
Fumio Sakai Japan
H. Cornille France
Javier Sanz Spain
Marco Marletta United Kingdom
Vladislav V. Kravchenko Mexico
H.‐G. Schöpf Germany
Hellmut Baumgärtel Germany
Armando Majorana Italy
H. Ekstein United States
E. Sabia Italy
Klaus Steffen relative to Fumio Sakai Japan Fumio Sakai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Fumio Sakai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Klaus Steffen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Klaus Steffen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Klaus Steffen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Klaus Steffen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Klaus Steffen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Klaus Steffen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Klaus Steffen. The network helps show where Klaus Steffen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Klaus Steffen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Klaus Steffen Line = papers co-authored together Klaus Steffen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1966110
2 2002100
3 201187
4 196674
5 199969
6 197631
7 197631
8 198622
9 198621
10 197218
11 198918
12 199314
13 199613
14 197213
15 199212
16 199310
17 19859
18 19787
19
THE 208/113 Kev $gamma$-$gamma$ CASCADE OF Hf$sup 17$$sup 7$
19575
20 19995

About Klaus Steffen

Klaus Steffen is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computational Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 33 papers that have together received 700 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (10 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (9 papers), Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (6 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (6 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (5 papers), Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (5 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (3 papers) and Numerical methods in inverse problems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (399 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (264 citations), Mathematical Physics (123 citations), Geometry and Topology (83 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (108 citations). Klaus Steffen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Frank Duzaar, Giuseppe Mingione, Fabrice Béthuel, Stefan Müller, Gerhard Huisken, H. Hultschig, W. Flauger, F.W. Brasse, W. Albrecht and H.‐J. Behrend. Their work appears in journals such as Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal), The European Physical Journal A, Mathematische Zeitschrift, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis and manuscripta mathematica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact