Klaus John Schnake

6.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
172 papers, 3.4k citations indexed

About

Klaus John Schnake is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Klaus John Schnake has authored 172 papers receiving a total of 3.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 161 papers in Surgery, 117 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 12 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Klaus John Schnake's work include Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (143 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (116 papers) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (72 papers). Klaus John Schnake is often cited by papers focused on Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (143 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (116 papers) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (72 papers). Klaus John Schnake collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Klaus John Schnake's co-authors include Frank Kandziora, F. Cumhur Öner, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Marcel F. Dvorak, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran, Maximilian Reinhold, Gregory D. Schroeder, Luiz Roberto Vialle, Michael G. Fehlings and Bizhan Aarabi and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Spine and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

In The Last Decade

Klaus John Schnake

153 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Hit Papers

AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 100 200 300 400 500

Peers

Klaus John Schnake
Bobby Tay United States
Carl Lauryssen United States
Neel Anand United States
James C. Bayley United States
Eeric Truumees United States
Larry T. Khoo United States
Bobby Tay United States
Klaus John Schnake
Citations per year, relative to Klaus John Schnake Klaus John Schnake (= 1×) peers Bobby Tay

Countries citing papers authored by Klaus John Schnake

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Klaus John Schnake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Klaus John Schnake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Klaus John Schnake more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Klaus John Schnake

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Klaus John Schnake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Klaus John Schnake. The network helps show where Klaus John Schnake may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Klaus John Schnake

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Klaus John Schnake. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Klaus John Schnake based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Klaus John Schnake. Klaus John Schnake is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Asmussen, Michael J., F. Cumhur Öner, Klaus John Schnake, et al.. (2025). Surgical versus Non-Surgical Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures in Neurologically Intact Patients: A Prospective International Multicentre Cohort Study. Global Spine Journal. 16(1). 628–638. 1 indexed citations
2.
Dvořák, Milan, Klaus John Schnake, Bruce Richard, et al.. (2025). Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures in neurologically intact patients: A prospective international multicentre cohort study. Brain and Spine. 5. 104707–104707.
4.
Glinski, Alexander von, Emre Yilmaz, Lorin M. Benneker, et al.. (2024). Historical Perspectives on the Evolution of Spino-Pelvic Fixation and its Implications on Clinical Care A Narrative Review. Global Spine Journal. 15(1). 228–240.
5.
Sadiqi, Said, Sander Muijs, Marcel W. M. Post, et al.. (2024). Validation of the AO Spine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) in the clinical setting. European Spine Journal. 33(4). 1607–1616. 2 indexed citations
6.
Schwarz, Falko, Eric W. Klee, Philipp Schenk, et al.. (2023). Impact of Anxiety During Hospitalization on the Clinical Outcome of Patients With Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture. Global Spine Journal. 15(2). 417–424. 2 indexed citations
7.
Schnake, Klaus John. (2023). Operative Versorgung der Typ 2 Dens Fraktur bei >80j – Synthese. 7(1). 47–49. 1 indexed citations
8.
Spiegl, Ulrich, Holger Keil, Georg Osterhoff, et al.. (2023). Combined Odontoid (C2) and Atlas (C1) Fractures in Geriatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Treatment Recommendation. Global Spine Journal. 13(1_suppl). 22S–28S.
9.
Schnake, Klaus John, et al.. (2023). 159. Predictive algorithm for surgery recommendation in thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits. The Spine Journal. 23(9). S81–S82. 1 indexed citations
10.
Kanna, Rishi Mugesh, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran, Gregory D. Schroeder, et al.. (2022). Lumbo-sacral Junction Instability by Traumatic Sacral Fractures: Isler’s Classification Revisited – A Narrative Review. Global Spine Journal. 12(8). 1925–1933. 3 indexed citations
11.
Karamian, Brian A., Gregory D. Schroeder, Mark J. Lambrechts, et al.. (2022). The Influence of Regional Differences on the Reliability of the AO Spine Sacral Injury Classification System. Global Spine Journal. 13(7). 2025–2032.
12.
Lambrechts, Mark J., Gregory D. Schroeder, Brian A. Karamian, et al.. (2022). Development of Online Technique for International Validation of the AO Spine Subaxial Injury Classification System. Global Spine Journal. 14(1). 177–186. 5 indexed citations
13.
Lambrechts, Mark J., Gregory D. Schroeder, Brian A. Karamian, et al.. (2022). Global Validation of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Injury Classification: Geographic Region Affects Reliability and Reproducibility. Global Spine Journal. 14(3). 821–829. 1 indexed citations
14.
Schnake, Klaus John, et al.. (2022). Correction to: Closed‑suction drainage in thoracolumbar spinal surgery–clinical routine without evidence? a systematic review. European Spine Journal. 31(5). 1331–1331. 1 indexed citations
15.
Canseco, José A., Gregory D. Schroeder, Taylor Paziuk, et al.. (2020). The Subaxial Cervical AO Spine Injury Score. Global Spine Journal. 12(6). 1066–1073. 7 indexed citations
16.
Palmowski, Yannick, et al.. (2020). Relationship Between the OF Classification and Radiological Outcome of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures After Kyphoplasty. Global Spine Journal. 12(4). 646–653. 12 indexed citations
17.
Sadiqi, Said, Jorrit‐Jan Verlaan, A. Mechteld Lehr, et al.. (2016). Universal disease-specific outcome instruments for spine trauma: a global perspective on relevant parameters to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes of thoracic and lumbar spine trauma patients. European Spine Journal. 26(5). 1541–1549. 8 indexed citations
18.
Reinhold, Maximilian, et al.. (2013). AO spine injury classification system: a revision proposal for the thoracic and lumbar spine. European Spine Journal. 22(10). 2184–2201. 135 indexed citations
19.
Scotti, Fabio, R Schröder, Florian Streitparth, et al.. (2010). Ultraschall zur Beurteilung des posterioren Ligamentkomplexes bei thorakolumbalen Wirbelsäulenfrakturen. Der Radiologe. 50(12). 1132–1140. 4 indexed citations
20.
Stavridis, Stavros I., et al.. (2009). Implant removal after posterior stabilization of the thoraco-lumbar spine. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 130(1). 119–123. 38 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026