Philipp Schenk

674 total citations
42 papers, 396 citations indexed

About

Philipp Schenk is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Philipp Schenk has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 396 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Surgery, 13 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 10 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Philipp Schenk's work include Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (17 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (17 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (13 papers). Philipp Schenk is often cited by papers focused on Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (17 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (17 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (13 papers). Philipp Schenk collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Italy. Philipp Schenk's co-authors include Bernhard Ullrich, Thomas Mendel, Tobias Siebert, Markus Böl, Gunther O. Hofmann, Reinhard Blickhan, Andreas Klipstein, Thomas Läubli, Marco Pozzo and Kay Leichsenring and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Biomechanics and European Journal of Applied Physiology.

In The Last Decade

Philipp Schenk

34 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philipp Schenk Germany 10 158 146 125 57 51 42 396
Sébastien Laporte France 10 155 1.0× 127 0.9× 94 0.8× 97 1.7× 68 1.3× 36 353
Murat Zinnuroğlu Türkiye 10 237 1.5× 54 0.4× 124 1.0× 23 0.4× 86 1.7× 36 459
Bo-ram Choi South Korea 10 95 0.6× 119 0.8× 114 0.9× 72 1.3× 168 3.3× 44 404
Burke Gurney United States 10 371 2.3× 207 1.4× 159 1.3× 23 0.4× 58 1.1× 17 725
Lori Thein Brody United States 12 164 1.0× 184 1.3× 198 1.6× 19 0.3× 83 1.6× 20 484
Hazel M. Clarkson Canada 4 148 0.9× 91 0.6× 62 0.5× 31 0.5× 71 1.4× 5 347
İlknur Tuğcu Türkiye 10 229 1.4× 110 0.8× 138 1.1× 52 0.9× 134 2.6× 16 503
Carolyn T. Wadsworth United States 8 340 2.2× 123 0.8× 145 1.2× 65 1.1× 101 2.0× 10 592
Uwe Schütz Germany 12 144 0.9× 82 0.6× 77 0.6× 94 1.6× 71 1.4× 32 370
Rodrigo Ribeiro de Oliveira Brazil 12 224 1.4× 123 0.8× 350 2.8× 43 0.8× 116 2.3× 43 518

Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Schenk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Schenk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Schenk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Schenk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Schenk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Schenk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Schenk. The network helps show where Philipp Schenk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philipp Schenk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philipp Schenk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philipp Schenk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philipp Schenk. Philipp Schenk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ullrich, Bernhard, Philipp Schenk, Michael Scherer, et al.. (2025). OF-score for osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures– which parameter is decisive for the therapy decision? - a prospective multicentric cohort study. European Spine Journal. 34(11). 5045–5052.
2.
Buser, Zorica, Sophie Leroy, Jeffrey C. Wang, et al.. (2025). Pain and Functional Outcome After Microsurgical Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Very Short- and Long-Term Postoperative Analysis. Global Spine Journal. 15(6). 2938–2946.
3.
Schenk, Philipp, et al.. (2024). Compressive effect and collapse behavior of three different transsacral implants in sacral fragility fractures - a retrospective analysis of 106 cases. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 50(6). 2963–2973. 1 indexed citations
7.
Ullrich, Bernhard, et al.. (2024). Comparison of Spectral CT and MRI in Pelvic Ring Fragility Fractures: A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 13(18). 5446–5446.
8.
Mendel, Thomas, et al.. (2024). Conservative management of proximal hamstring avulsion: A clinical study. Journal of Orthopaedics. 55. 74–79. 2 indexed citations
9.
Schwarz, Falko, Eric W. Klee, Philipp Schenk, et al.. (2023). Impact of Anxiety During Hospitalization on the Clinical Outcome of Patients With Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture. Global Spine Journal. 15(2). 417–424. 2 indexed citations
10.
Schenk, Philipp, Gunther O. Hofmann, Uta Biedermann, et al.. (2023). Fibula Nail versus Locking Plate Fixation—A Biomechanical Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 12(2). 698–698. 5 indexed citations
12.
Klos, Kajetan, Paul Simons, Philipp Schenk, et al.. (2023). Biomechanical Comparison of Medio-Plantar and Plantar Plate Fixation for First Tarsometatarsal Joint Arthrodesis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 12(12). 3896–3896. 3 indexed citations
13.
Mendel, Thomas, Bernhard Ullrich, Philipp Schenk, et al.. (2022). Perioperative outcome of minimally invasive stabilisation of bilateral fragility fractures of the sacrum: a comparative study of bisegmental transsacral stabilisation versus spinopelvic fixation. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 49(2). 1001–1010. 2 indexed citations
14.
Schenk, Philipp, et al.. (2022). The role of the posterior malleolus in the treatment of unstable upper ankle joint injuries - A biomechanical study. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 28(7). 979–985. 1 indexed citations
15.
Ullrich, Bernhard, Falko Schwarz, Aaron Lawson McLean, et al.. (2021). Inter-Rater Reliability of Hounsfield Units as a Measure of Bone Density: Applications in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures. World Neurosurgery. 158. e711–e716. 18 indexed citations
16.
Schenk, Philipp, et al.. (2021). Open versus minimally invasive fixation of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal diseases. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 48(3). 2297–2307. 13 indexed citations
17.
Ullrich, Bernhard, et al.. (2021). Lokales Wirbelsäulenprofil nach operativer Behandlung thorakolumbaler und lumbaler Frakturen. Der Unfallchirurg. 125(4). 295–304.
18.
Mendel, Thomas, Bernhard Ullrich, Gunther O. Hofmann, et al.. (2020). Progressive instability of bilateral sacral fragility fractures in osteoporotic bone: a retrospective analysis of X-ray, CT, and MRI datasets from 78 cases. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 47(1). 11–19. 23 indexed citations
19.
Schenk, Philipp, et al.. (2020). A simple geometrical model accounting for 3D muscle architectural changes across muscle lengths. Journal of Biomechanics. 103. 109694–109694. 7 indexed citations
20.
Ullrich, Bernhard, Philipp Schenk, Ulrich Spiegl, Thomas Mendel, & Gunther O. Hofmann. (2018). Hounsfield units as predictor for cage subsidence and loss of reduction: following posterior-anterior stabilization in thoracolumbar spine fractures. European Spine Journal. 27(12). 3034–3042. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026