Klaudia Polak
About
In The Last Decade
Klaudia Polak
6 papers receiving 551 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Molecular Biology 362
- Cancer Research 230
- Physiology 110
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 70
- Oncology 64
Countries citing papers authored by Klaudia Polak
This map shows the geographic impact of Klaudia Polak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Klaudia Polak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Klaudia Polak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Klaudia Polak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Klaudia Polak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Klaudia Polak. The network helps show where Klaudia Polak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Klaudia Polak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Klaudia Polak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Klaudia Polak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Klaudia Polak. Klaudia Polak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 29 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 379 | |
| 6 | 128 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.