King‐Wa Fu
Impact in
- Communication top 0.5%
- Social Media and Politics
- Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Papers in
-
- Misinformation and Its Impacts 15
- Disaster Management and Resilience 6
-
- Social Media and Politics 27
- Co-authors
- Paul S. F. Yip (13 shared papers)Isaac Chun‐Hai Fung (24 shared papers)Zion Tsz Ho Tse (23 shared papers)Chung‐hong Chan (13 shared papers)Hai Liang (16 shared papers)Paul Yip (8 shared papers)Michael Chau (6 shared papers)Paul Wong (9 shared papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (6 papers)Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (4 papers)Journal of Affective Disorders (4 papers)Journal of Information Technology & Politics (3 papers)Western Pacific surveillance response journal (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- Hong KongUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
King‐Wa Fu
115 papers receiving 4.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
- Communication 793
- Clinical Psychology 1.1k
- Health 388
- Sociology and Political Science 1.7k
- Applied Psychology 144
Countries citing papers authored by King‐Wa Fu
This map shows the geographic impact of King‐Wa Fu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by King‐Wa Fu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites King‐Wa Fu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by King‐Wa Fu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by King‐Wa Fu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by King‐Wa Fu. The network helps show where King‐Wa Fu may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside King‐Wa Fu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 115 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 220 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 207 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 153 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 120 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 108 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 104 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 104 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 103 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 103 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 88 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 87 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 87 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 85 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 81 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 79 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 77 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 74 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 73 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 72 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 71 |
About King‐Wa Fu
King‐Wa Fu is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Clinical Psychology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Epidemiology, having authored 115 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (27 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (18 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (15 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (10 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (10 papers), Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (9 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (6 papers) and China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (793 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Health (388 citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.7k citations) and Applied Psychology (144 citations). King‐Wa Fu has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Paul S. F. Yip, Isaac Chun‐Hai Fung, Zion Tsz Ho Tse, Chung‐hong Chan, Hai Liang, Paul Yip, Michael Chau, Paul Wong, Wincy S. C. Chan and Patrick Ip. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, Journal of Affective Disorders, Journal of Information Technology & Politics and Western Pacific surveillance response journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.