Kimberly Meier
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Deborah GiaschiMark R. BlairMarcus R. WatsonSteven BrownPeter Q. PfordresherMichel BelykMario LiottiLihan Chen
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (18 papers)Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (11 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kimberly Meier
26 papers receiving 408 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Cognitive Neuroscience 342
- Epidemiology 149
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 79
- Ophthalmology 63
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 55
Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly Meier
This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly Meier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly Meier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly Meier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly Meier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly Meier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly Meier. The network helps show where Kimberly Meier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kimberly Meier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kimberly Meier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kimberly Meier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kimberly Meier. Kimberly Meier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Fixation stability is not related to global motion deficits in amblyopia | 1 |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | The impact of category type and working memory span on attentional learning in categorization | 8 |
| 20 | 41 |
About Kimberly Meier
Kimberly Meier is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (18 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (11 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (342 citations), Music (24 citations) and Ophthalmology (63 citations). Kimberly Meier has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Deborah Giaschi, Mark R. Blair, Marcus R. Watson, Steven Brown, Peter Q. Pfordresher, Michel Belyk, Mario Liotti, Lihan Chen, D. Regan and Christine M. Chapman. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.