Stephanie Jainta

734 total citations
37 papers, 562 citations indexed

About

Stephanie Jainta is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephanie Jainta has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 562 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 papers in Epidemiology and 9 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Stephanie Jainta's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (27 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (12 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (9 papers). Stephanie Jainta is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (27 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (12 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (9 papers). Stephanie Jainta collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and France. Stephanie Jainta's co-authors include Wolfgang Jaschinski, Zoı̈ Kapoula, Jörg Hoormann, Thierry Baccino, Simon P. Liversedge, Hazel I. Blythe, Arnold J. Wilkins, Maria Pia Bucci, Matthew Jones and Sylvette Wiener‐Vacher and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Current Biology and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance.

In The Last Decade

Stephanie Jainta

37 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers

Stephanie Jainta

EPIDE

DEP

OPHTH

ECP

Scott B. Steinman United States

Gustaf Öqvist Seimyr Sweden

Karine Doré-Mazars France

Stefan Gezeck Germany

Dorine Vergilino‐Perez France

Anna Przekoracka‐Krawczyk Poland

Zahra Hussain United Kingdom

Emmanuel Bui-Quoc France

Raiju J. Babu Canada

Tim Cornelissen Germany

Scott B. Steinman United States

Stephanie Jainta

517 ×1.3

104 ×0.7

EPIDE

68 ×0.5

DEP

84 ×0.6

OPHTH

57 ×0.7

ECP

Citations per year, relative to Stephanie Jainta Stephanie Jainta (= 1×) peers Scott B. Steinman

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Jainta

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Jainta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Jainta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Jainta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Jainta

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Jainta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Jainta. The network helps show where Stephanie Jainta may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Jainta

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Jainta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Jainta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Jainta. Stephanie Jainta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Jainta, Stephanie, et al.. (2019). Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria. Journal of Eye Movement Research. 12(4). 7 indexed citations

Jainta, Stephanie, et al.. (2018). Binocular advantages for parafoveal processing in reading. Vision Research. 145. 56–63. 8 indexed citations

Jainta, Stephanie, et al.. (2016). Does text contrast mediate binocular advantages in reading?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 43(1). 55–68. 12 indexed citations

Jainta, Stephanie, et al.. (2015). A comparative analysis of vertical and horizontal fixation disparity in sentence reading. Vision Research. 110(Pt A). 118–127. 17 indexed citations

Jainta, Stephanie, et al.. (2014). Vergence responses to vertical binocular disparity during lexical identification. Vision Research. 106. 27–35. 6 indexed citations

Jainta, Stephanie & Wolfgang Jaschinski. (2012). Individual Differences in Binocular Coordination Are Uncovered by Directly Comparing Monocular and Binocular Reading Conditions. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 53(9). 5762–5762. 18 indexed citations

Grosjean, Marc, Gerhard Rinkenauer, & Stephanie Jainta. (2012). Where Do the Eyes Really Go in the Hollow-Face Illusion?. PLoS ONE. 7(9). e44706–e44706. 5 indexed citations

Blythe, Hazel I., Nicolas S. Holliman, Stephanie Jainta, Lee Tbaily, & Simon P. Liversedge. (2012). Binocular coordination in response to two‐dimensional, three‐dimensional and stereoscopic visual stimuli. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 32(5). 397–411. 5 indexed citations

Jainta, Stephanie, Maria Pia Bucci, Sylvette Wiener‐Vacher, & Zoı̈ Kapoula. (2011). Changes in vergence dynamics due to repetition. Vision Research. 51(16). 1845–1852. 19 indexed citations

10.

Jainta, Stephanie & Zoı̈ Kapoula. (2011). Dyslexic Children Are Confronted with Unstable Binocular Fixation while Reading. PLoS ONE. 6(4). e18694–e18694. 74 indexed citations

11.

Jainta, Stephanie, et al.. (2010). Binocularity during reading fixations: Properties of the minimum fixation disparity. Vision Research. 50(18). 1775–1785. 24 indexed citations

12.

Jainta, Stephanie & Thierry Baccino. (2010). Analyzing the pupil response due to increased cognitive demand: An independent component analysis study. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 77(1). 1–7. 37 indexed citations

13.

Jaschinski, Wolfgang, et al.. (2010). Objective vs subjective measures of fixation disparity for short and long fixation periods. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 30(4). 379–390. 20 indexed citations

14.

Jainta, Stephanie, Jörg Hoormann, & Wolfgang Jaschinski. (2009). Accommodation modulates the individual difference between objective and subjective measures of the final convergence step response. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 29(2). 162–172. 10 indexed citations

15.

Jaschinski, Wolfgang, et al.. (2008). Vergence errors during short and steady fixations measured with objective and subjective methods. Perception. 37. 58–58. 1 indexed citations

16.

Jaschinski, Wolfgang, et al.. (2008). Relation between fixation disparity and the asymmetry between convergent and divergent disparity step responses. Vision Research. 48(2). 253–263. 20 indexed citations

17.

Jainta, Stephanie, et al.. (2008). Ocular accommodation and cognitive demand: An additional indicator besides pupil size and cardiovascular measures?. Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine. 7(1). 6–6. 6 indexed citations

18.

Jainta, Stephanie, Jörg Hoormann, & Wolfgang Jaschinski. (2007). Objective and subjective measures of vergence step responses. Vision Research. 47(26). 3238–3246. 12 indexed citations

19.

Jaschinski, Wolfgang, et al.. (2007). Objective vs subjective measurements of dark vergence. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 27(1). 85–92. 24 indexed citations

20.

Jaschinski, Wolfgang, Stephanie Jainta, & Michael Schürer. (2006). Capture of visual direction in dynamic vergence is reduced with flashed monocular lines. Vision Research. 46(16). 2608–2614. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact