Kimberly J. Smith
- Accounting top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Finance top 5%
- Management Information Systems top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Denise A. JonesJohn F. BoschenLawrence A. GordonAugustine DuruWanda A. WallaceHolger DaskePaul MunterJannis Bischof
- Topics
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (8 papers)Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (6 papers)Corporate Finance and Governance (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth AfricaGermany
In The Last Decade
Kimberly J. Smith
12 papers receiving 281 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- Accounting 265
- Strategy and Management 166
- Finance 96
- Management Information Systems 40
- Economics and Econometrics 38
Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly J. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly J. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly J. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly J. Smith. The network helps show where Kimberly J. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kimberly J. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kimberly J. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kimberly J. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kimberly J. Smith. Kimberly J. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | Comparing the Value Relevance, Predictive Value, and Persistence of Other Comprehensive Income and Special Items | 15 |
| 9 | 147 | |
| 10 | 59 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | Asset Impairment Disclosures: Will Accounting for Asset Impairment Lead to Performance Impairment? | 0 |
| 15 | 33 |
About Kimberly J. Smith
Kimberly J. Smith is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance, having authored 15 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (8 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (6 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (265 citations), Strategy and Management (166 citations) and Finance (96 citations). Kimberly J. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Denise A. Jones, John F. Boschen, Lawrence A. Gordon, Augustine Duru, Wanda A. Wallace, Holger Daske, Paul Munter, Jannis Bischof, Elizabeth A. Gordon and Chika Saka. Their work appears in journals such as The Accounting Review, Accounting Organizations and Society and The Journal of Business.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.