Thomas F. Schaefer
- Accounting top 2%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Finance top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Management Information Systems
- Co-authors
- Chao‐Shin LiuAgnes ChengRichard M. MortonAnwer S. AhmedAndrew ChristieG. Lee WillingerKenneth S. LorekLi‐Chin Jennifer Ho
- Topics
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (11 papers)Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (10 papers)Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesLatvia
In The Last Decade
Thomas F. Schaefer
16 papers receiving 421 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Accounting 449
- Strategy and Management 321
- Finance 170
- Economics and Econometrics 35
- Management Information Systems 28
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas F. Schaefer
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas F. Schaefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas F. Schaefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas F. Schaefer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas F. Schaefer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas F. Schaefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas F. Schaefer. The network helps show where Thomas F. Schaefer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas F. Schaefer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas F. Schaefer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas F. Schaefer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas F. Schaefer. Thomas F. Schaefer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | Asset Sales or Loans: The Case of Lehman Brothers Repo 105s | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | Advanced Accounting, 9th Edition | 2 |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | Fundamentals of Advanced Accounting | 0 |
| 9 | 74 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | The value-relevance of SFAS no. 95 cash flows from operations as assessed by security market effects | 89 |
| 13 | 132 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 57 |
About Thomas F. Schaefer
Thomas F. Schaefer is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance, having authored 19 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (11 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (10 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (449 citations), Strategy and Management (321 citations) and Finance (170 citations). Thomas F. Schaefer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Chao‐Shin Liu, Agnes Cheng, Richard M. Morton, Anwer S. Ahmed, Andrew Christie, G. Lee Willinger, Kenneth S. Lorek, Li‐Chin Jennifer Ho, William S. Hopwood and Timothy S. Doupnik. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Accounting and Economics, Journal of Accounting Research and The Accounting Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.