Kimberly E. Cello

11 papers receiving 728 citations

Peers

Kimberly E. Cello
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Ophthalmology 373
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 44
  • Neurology 108
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 108
  • Epidemiology 131
Replace Caroline Dodridge with:
Caroline Dodridge United Kingdom
Donna N. Loupe United States
D Poinoosawmy United Kingdom
Robert Laemmer Germany
Patricia Nelson United States
E C O'Neill United Kingdom
Jean‐François Rouland France
Shiho Kunimatsu‐Sanuki Japan
Nicholas Y.Q. Tan Singapore
Brad D. Simons United States
Kimberly E. Cello relative to Caroline Dodridge United Kingdom Caroline Dodridge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Caroline Dodridge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly E. Cello

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly E. Cello's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly E. Cello with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly E. Cello more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly E. Cello

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly E. Cello. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly E. Cello. The network helps show where Kimberly E. Cello may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Kimberly E. Cello, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kimberly E. Cello Line = papers co-authored together Kimberly E. Cello links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1
Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results.
2000208
2 2000189
3 200697
4 200269
5 201448
6 201638
7 200736
8 201329
9 201524
10 20117
11
Classification of Glaucomatous Visual Field Abnormalities In the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS)
20031

About Kimberly E. Cello

Kimberly E. Cello is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology and Rheumatology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 746 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (3 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (1 paper), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper), Retinal and Optic Conditions (1 paper), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (1 paper) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (373 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (44 citations), Neurology (108 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (108 citations) and Epidemiology (131 citations). Kimberly E. Cello has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Chris A. Johnson, Jacqueline M. Nelson-Quigg, John L. Keltner, Michael Wall, Michael A. Kass, Donald L. Budenz, Richard A. Levine, Juanjuan Fan, Mae O. Gordon and Harry A. Quigley. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Ophthalmology, Journal of Glaucoma, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact