Caroline Dodridge

603 total citations
9 papers, 387 citations indexed

About

Caroline Dodridge is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Caroline Dodridge has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 387 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Epidemiology, 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Caroline Dodridge's work include Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (5 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (4 papers). Caroline Dodridge is often cited by papers focused on Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (5 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (4 papers). Caroline Dodridge collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Caroline Dodridge's co-authors include Claire Howard, Fiona J. Rowe, Tracey Shipman, Darren Brand, Carole Jackson, Alison Price, Laura Walker, Sean Harrison, Christopher Eccleston and Scott MacDiarmid and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and BioMed Research International.

In The Last Decade

Caroline Dodridge

9 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Caroline Dodridge United Kingdom 8 250 153 135 88 58 9 387
Darren Brand United Kingdom 5 182 0.7× 116 0.8× 100 0.7× 74 0.8× 44 0.8× 9 303
Lauren R. Hepworth United Kingdom 13 325 1.3× 184 1.2× 182 1.3× 110 1.3× 34 0.6× 35 511
Tracey Shipman United Kingdom 9 264 1.1× 158 1.0× 152 1.1× 93 1.1× 64 1.1× 14 467
Jim Currie United Kingdom 8 193 0.8× 124 0.8× 102 0.8× 65 0.7× 24 0.4× 10 307
Jayne Angilley United Kingdom 6 164 0.7× 123 0.8× 83 0.6× 67 0.8× 21 0.4× 8 267
Clair A Henderson United Kingdom 6 158 0.6× 118 0.8× 82 0.6× 65 0.7× 21 0.4× 8 261
Daniella Rutner United States 7 351 1.4× 94 0.6× 197 1.5× 35 0.4× 278 4.8× 12 506
Katrina Livingstone United Kingdom 8 123 0.5× 145 0.9× 63 0.5× 52 0.6× 18 0.3× 10 260
M.E. Han United States 5 297 1.2× 69 0.5× 158 1.2× 28 0.3× 246 4.2× 7 426
Diana P. Ludlam United States 13 377 1.5× 105 0.7× 185 1.4× 13 0.1× 290 5.0× 25 493

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Dodridge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Dodridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Dodridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Dodridge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Dodridge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Dodridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Dodridge. The network helps show where Caroline Dodridge may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Dodridge

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Dodridge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Dodridge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Dodridge. Caroline Dodridge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Rowe, Fiona J., Lauren R. Hepworth, Elizabeth J. Conroy, et al.. (2019). Visual Function Questionnaire as an outcome measure for homonymous hemianopia: subscales and supplementary questions, analysis from the VISION trial. Eye. 33(9). 1485–1493. 9 indexed citations
2.
Rowe, Fiona J., Kerry Hanna, Jennifer Evans, et al.. (2018). Interventions for eye movement disorders due to acquired brain injury. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018(3). CD011290–CD011290. 21 indexed citations
3.
Rowe, Fiona J., Elizabeth J. Conroy, Emma Bedson, et al.. (2016). A Randomised Controlled Trial of Treatment for Post-Stroke Homonymous Hemianopia: Screening and Recruitment. Neuro-Ophthalmology. 40(1). 1–7. 8 indexed citations
4.
Rowe, Fiona J., Elizabeth J. Conroy, Emma Bedson, et al.. (2016). A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing effectiveness of prism glasses, visual search training and standard care in hemianopia. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 136(4). 310–321. 42 indexed citations
6.
Rowe, Fiona J., Carmel Noonan, Marta García‐Fiñana, et al.. (2014). Interventions for eye movement disorders due to acquired brain injury. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 5 indexed citations
7.
Rowe, Fiona J., David M. Wright, Darren Brand, et al.. (2013). A Prospective Profile of Visual Field Loss following Stroke: Prevalence, Type, Rehabilitation, and Outcome. BioMed Research International. 2013. 1–12. 111 indexed citations
8.
Rowe, Fiona J., David M. Wright, Darren Brand, et al.. (2013). Profile of Gaze Dysfunction following Cerebrovascular Accident. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2013. 1–8. 18 indexed citations
9.
Rowe, Fiona J., Darren Brand, Carole Jackson, et al.. (2008). Visual impairment following stroke: do stroke patients require vision assessment?. Age and Ageing. 38(2). 188–193. 156 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026