Kim Lewis

33.7k citations
135 papers · 20.9k indexed · 11 hit papers · h-index 67

Impact in

Papers in

Kim Lewis

133 papers receiving 20.3k citations

Hit Papers

The Science of Antibiotic Discovery 2020 · 506 citations
50620002026200820174008001.2k

Peers

Kim Lewis
Comparison fields: 5 of 183
  • Molecular Medicine 5.7k
  • Endocrinology 2.4k
  • Microbiology 2.1k
  • Genetics 5.0k
  • Infectious Diseases 2.9k
Replace Ian T. Paulsen with:
Ian T. Paulsen Australia
Keith Poole Canada
Staffan Normark Sweden
Paul Williams United Kingdom
Herbert P. Schweizer United States
Shahriar Mobashery United States
Julian Davies Canada
Scott A. Beatson Australia
Mark A. Schembri Australia
Frederick M. Ausubel United States
Kim Lewis relative to Ian T. Paulsen Australia Ian T. Paulsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Ian T. Paulsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Lewis. The network helps show where Kim Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kim Lewis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kim Lewis Line = papers co-authored together Kim Lewis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20244
2 20240
3 20232
4 202321
5 20227
6 202198
7 202014
8 20206
9
ATP-Dependent Persister Formation in Escherichia coli
Hit paper breakdown →
2017332
10 2013409
11 2009264
12 2009181
13
Mechanism of Persister Formation in Bacteria and Fungi
20081
14 2007198
15 2006230
16 2006467
17 200686
18 2005123
19
Specialized Persister Cells and the Mechanism of Multidrug Tolerance in Escherichia coli
Hit paper breakdown →
2004672
20 200162

About Kim Lewis

Kim Lewis is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Endocrinology, Pharmacology, Aging and Genetics, having authored 135 papers that have together received 20.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (51 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (45 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (23 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (18 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (10 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (9 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (8 papers) and Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (5.7k citations), Endocrinology (2.4k citations), Microbiology (2.1k citations), Genetics (5.0k citations) and Infectious Diseases (2.9k citations). Kim Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Amy L. Spoering, Marin Vulić, Alexander M. Klibanov, Slava S. Epstein, Iris Keren, Olga Lomovskaya, Tobias Dörr, Lawrence Mulcahy, Joerg C. Tiller and Frank R. Stermitz. Their work appears in journals such as Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, mBio, Journal of Bacteriology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026