Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Anthocyanins, Phenolics, and Antioxidant Capacity in Diverse Small Fruits: Vaccinium,Rubus, andRibes
2001774 citationsR. A. Moyer, Kim E. Hummer et al.Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Kim E. Hummer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim E. Hummer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim E. Hummer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim E. Hummer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim E. Hummer. The network helps show where Kim E. Hummer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim E. Hummer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim E. Hummer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim E. Hummer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kim E. Hummer. Kim E. Hummer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hummer, Kim E. & Lawrence A. Alice. (2017). Small genomes in tetraploid Rubus L. (Rosaceae) from New Zealand and southern South America.. Journal of American Pomological Society. 71(1). 2–7.3 indexed citations
Iketani, Hiroyuki, Kim E. Hummer, & Joseph Postman. (2009). Collaborative exploration between NIAS Genebank and USDA ARS (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service) for the collection of genetic resources of fruit and nut species in Hokkaido and the Northern Tohoku region (国内探索収集調査報告). 26. 13–26.2 indexed citations
7.
Dalton, Daniel T. & Kim E. Hummer. (2009). Inheritance of the Cr gene in Ribes nigrum.. Journal of American Pomological Society. 63(4). 142–144.2 indexed citations
8.
Hall, Harvey K., et al.. (2009). Raspberry breeding and genetics.. 32. 39–353.22 indexed citations
Moyer, R. A., Kim E. Hummer, Chad E. Finn, Balz Frei, & Ronald E. Wrolstad. (2001). Anthocyanins, Phenolics, and Antioxidant Capacity in Diverse Small Fruits: Vaccinium,Rubus, andRibes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 50(3). 519–525.774 indexed citations breakdown →
Hummer, Kim E.. (1997). Diamonds in the rust: Ribes resistance to white pine blister rust.. Fruit varieties journal. 51(2). 112–117.4 indexed citations
15.
Hummer, Kim E., et al.. (1995). Cold hardiness in Rubus.. Fruit varieties journal. 49(1). 52–58.5 indexed citations
Hummer, Kim E., et al.. (1993). Seed germination of Ribes hybrids.. Fruit varieties journal. 47(4). 229–233.5 indexed citations
19.
Hummer, Kim E.. (1990). Interstate restrictions on movement of Ribes germplasm.. Fruit varieties journal. 44(4). 194–197.1 indexed citations
20.
Postman, Joseph & Kim E. Hummer. (1988). Virus tested pear germplasm available at the National Clonal Germplasm Repository in Corvallis, Oregon.. Fruit varieties journal. 42(3). 109–115.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.