Kim de Groot

413 total citations
15 papers, 236 citations indexed

About

Kim de Groot is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Health Information Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Kim de Groot has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 236 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in General Health Professions, 8 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects and 6 papers in Health Information Management. Recurrent topics in Kim de Groot's work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (8 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers). Kim de Groot is often cited by papers focused on Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (8 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers). Kim de Groot collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Austria and Italy. Kim de Groot's co-authors include Anneke L. Francke, Wolter Paans, A.J.E. de Veer, Mattanja Triemstra, A. Brabers, Maria Müller‐Staub, Renate Verkaik, Fabio D’Agostino and Ronald Batenburg and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies and BMC Health Services Research.

In The Last Decade

Kim de Groot

11 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers

Kim de Groot
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 131
  • General Health Professions 122
  • Health Information Management 79
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 55
  • Education 26
Replace Cindy A. Scherb with:
Cindy A. Scherb United States
Inger Jansson Sweden
Anna C. Alt‐White United States
Harlon França de Menezes Brazil
Fernando Riegel Brazil
Elizabeth Heffernan Ireland
Kathy Chappell United States
Sheyla Costa de Oliveira Brazil
Inga M. Zadvinskis United States
Maria D’Innocenzo Brazil
Cindy A. Scherb United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Kim de Groot
Kim de Groot · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Kim de Groot
Kim de Groot · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Kim de Groot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim de Groot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim de Groot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim de Groot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim de Groot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim de Groot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim de Groot. The network helps show where Kim de Groot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim de Groot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim de Groot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim de Groot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim de Groot. Kim de Groot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 2
3 0
4 46
5 0
6 6
7 7
8 11
9 2
10 48
11
Het organiseren van langdurige zorg en ondersteuning voor thuiswonende patiënten: ervaringen van praktijkondersteuners in de huisartsenzorg.
0
12 71
13 2
14 2
15 39

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026