Inger Jansson

497 total citations
31 papers, 324 citations indexed

About

Inger Jansson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Inger Jansson has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 324 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in General Health Professions, 14 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects and 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Inger Jansson's work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (14 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (7 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (6 papers). Inger Jansson is often cited by papers focused on Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (14 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (7 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (6 papers). Inger Jansson collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, China and Australia. Inger Jansson's co-authors include Anna Forsberg, Maria Engström, Ulrika Pöder, Barbro Wadensten, Lena Nordgren, Margret Lepp, Jan Nilsson, Janeth Leksell, Henrietta Forsman and Inger Ekman and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Advanced Nursing and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

In The Last Decade

Inger Jansson

28 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Inger Jansson Sweden 11 162 103 91 47 45 31 324
Carmen La Cerra Italy 10 114 0.7× 115 1.1× 42 0.5× 37 0.8× 49 1.1× 20 367
Anna C. Alt‐White United States 13 264 1.6× 99 1.0× 58 0.6× 60 1.3× 69 1.5× 23 414
Barbara Jo Foley United States 8 279 1.7× 171 1.7× 38 0.4× 57 1.2× 66 1.5× 14 364
Ronald Piscotty United States 10 111 0.7× 45 0.4× 53 0.6× 69 1.5× 33 0.7× 26 301
Valorie Dearmon United States 9 152 0.9× 71 0.7× 31 0.3× 59 1.3× 90 2.0× 16 330
Ann Bowling United States 7 102 0.6× 84 0.8× 27 0.3× 37 0.8× 59 1.3× 15 299
Arlene M. Sperhac United States 7 208 1.3× 78 0.8× 50 0.5× 36 0.8× 43 1.0× 19 297
Cindy Zellefrow United States 11 375 2.3× 121 1.2× 212 2.3× 89 1.9× 46 1.0× 17 479
Francine Girard Canada 8 175 1.1× 46 0.4× 37 0.4× 25 0.5× 60 1.3× 14 253
Joan M. Kavanagh United States 5 127 0.8× 155 1.5× 64 0.7× 81 1.7× 125 2.8× 6 394

Countries citing papers authored by Inger Jansson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inger Jansson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inger Jansson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inger Jansson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inger Jansson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inger Jansson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inger Jansson. The network helps show where Inger Jansson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inger Jansson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inger Jansson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inger Jansson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inger Jansson. Inger Jansson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Ulin, Kerstin, Andreas Fors, Lilas Ali, Inger Ekman, & Inger Jansson. (2023). Flip focus and emphasise patient resources in person‐centred care over the telephone—A retrospective descriptive study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 37(3). 797–804.
3.
Engström, Maria, et al.. (2023). Preceptors' experiences of supervising internationally educated nurses attending a bridging program: An interview study. Nurse Education Today. 131. 105975–105975.
4.
Björvell, Catrin, et al.. (2023). Creating Subsets of International Classification for Nursing Practice Precoordinated Concepts. CIN Computers Informatics Nursing. 42(1). 21–26. 1 indexed citations
6.
Engström, Maria, et al.. (2021). Nurses’ experiences of a recertification process involving a series of examinations to obtain a nursing license in a new country. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 77(12). 4876–4886. 7 indexed citations
7.
Engström, Maria, et al.. (2021). Attending a bridging program to obtain a Swedish nursing license: An interview study with internationally educated nurses. Nurse Education Today. 99. 104744–104744. 19 indexed citations
8.
Florin, Jan, et al.. (2021). A comparison between the ICNP and the ICF for expressing nursing content in the electronic health record. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 154. 104544–104544. 3 indexed citations
9.
Pöder, Ulrika, et al.. (2021). Action research improved general prerequisites for evidence-based practice. Heliyon. 7(4). e06814–e06814. 2 indexed citations
10.
Jansson, Inger, et al.. (2021). ‘No one forced anybody to do anything – and yet everybody painted’: Experiences of Arts on Referral, a focus group study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1-2). 9–20. 4 indexed citations
11.
Forsman, Henrietta, Inger Jansson, Janeth Leksell, et al.. (2019). Clusters of competence: Relationship between self‐reported professional competence and achievement on a national examination among graduating nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 76(1). 199–208. 38 indexed citations
12.
Wadensten, Barbro, et al.. (2018). Struggling for a feasible tool – the process of implementing a clinical pathway in intensive care: a grounded theory study. BMC Health Services Research. 18(1). 831–831. 11 indexed citations
13.
Rosengren, Kristina, Louise Danielsson, Inger Jansson, & Catarina Wallengren. (2018). Development of an Academic Course in Person-Centred Care for Students in Higher Education: Teachers’ Perspectives. Education Research International. 2018. 1–9. 4 indexed citations
14.
Jansson, Inger & Anna Forsberg. (2016). How do nurses and ward managers perceive that evidence‐based sources are obtained to inform relevant nursing interventions? – an exploratory study. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 25(5-6). 769–776. 17 indexed citations
15.
Jansson, Inger, et al.. (2016). How the Nurse Anesthetist Decides to Manage Perioperative Fluid Status. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing. 31(5). 406–414. 5 indexed citations
16.
Jansson, Inger, et al.. (2015). Preliminary Evidence for the Usefulness of Standardized Nursing Terminologies in Different Fields of Application: A Literature Review. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge. 28(2). 109–119. 36 indexed citations
17.
Jansson, Inger, et al.. (2010). Factors and Conditions that Influence the Implementation of Standardized Nursing Care Plans. The Open Nursing Journal. 4(1). 25–34. 12 indexed citations
18.
Jansson, Inger, et al.. (2010). Factors and Conditions That Have an Impact in Relation to the Successful Implementation and Maintenance of Individual Care Plans. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 8(2). 66–75. 17 indexed citations
19.
Jansson, Inger, et al.. (2009). Evaluation of documented nursing care plans by the use of nursing‐sensitive outcome indicators. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 16(3). 611–618. 11 indexed citations
20.
Jansson, Inger, Ewa Pilhammar, & Anna Forsberg. (2009). Obtaining a Foundation for Nursing Care at the Time of Patient Admission: A Grounded Theory Study. The Open Nursing Journal. 3(1). 56–64. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026