Kim Copeland

796 total citations
10 papers, 576 citations indexed

About

Kim Copeland is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Kim Copeland has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 576 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Kim Copeland's work include Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (5 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (4 papers) and Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (3 papers). Kim Copeland is often cited by papers focused on Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (5 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (4 papers) and Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (3 papers). Kim Copeland collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Kim Copeland's co-authors include Jack Μ. Fletcher, Maureen Dennis, David J. Francis, Jon Frederick, Michael E. Brandt, H. Julia Hannay, Susan Blaser, Larry A. Kramer, James M. Drake and Ross Hetherington and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain, Neuropsychologia and Neuropsychology.

In The Last Decade

Kim Copeland

10 papers receiving 558 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kim Copeland United States 10 348 272 211 117 97 10 576
Goffredina Spanò United States 13 274 0.8× 112 0.4× 19 0.1× 75 0.6× 100 1.0× 20 622
Jeffrey H. Snow United States 12 58 0.2× 128 0.5× 36 0.2× 52 0.4× 137 1.4× 39 379
Ruth Donnelly Canada 11 189 0.5× 247 0.9× 259 1.2× 19 0.2× 35 0.4× 14 527
Pirkko Nieminen Finland 11 117 0.3× 303 1.1× 36 0.2× 71 0.6× 66 0.7× 19 483
Stéphanie Friszer France 13 124 0.4× 214 0.8× 54 0.3× 34 0.3× 99 1.0× 32 522
Linda Visser Netherlands 12 42 0.1× 112 0.4× 9 0.0× 105 0.9× 168 1.7× 53 597
D. Bechinger Germany 9 60 0.2× 142 0.5× 29 0.1× 68 0.6× 11 0.1× 18 322
Emily J. Helder United States 10 22 0.1× 61 0.2× 17 0.1× 186 1.6× 28 0.3× 22 379
Sally M. Kuehn Canada 13 52 0.1× 144 0.5× 16 0.1× 116 1.0× 65 0.7× 16 495
Reinhard Merkel Germany 8 43 0.1× 56 0.2× 57 0.3× 97 0.8× 25 0.3× 30 468

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Copeland

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Copeland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Copeland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Copeland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Copeland

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Copeland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Copeland. The network helps show where Kim Copeland may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Copeland

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Copeland. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Copeland based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Copeland. Kim Copeland is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Fletcher, Jack Μ., David J. Francis, Kimberly J. OʼMalley, et al.. (2009). Effects of a Bundled Accommodations Package on High-Stakes Testing for Middle School Students with Reading Disabilities. Exceptional Children. 75(4). 447–463. 14 indexed citations
2.
Barnes, Marcia A., et al.. (2007). The Impact of Spina Bifida on Development Across the First 3 Years. Developmental Neuropsychology. 31(1). 1–20. 49 indexed citations
3.
Fletcher, Jack Μ., et al.. (2006). Effects of Accommodations on High-Stakes Testing for Students with Reading Disabilities. Exceptional Children. 72(2). 136–150. 59 indexed citations
5.
Fletcher, Jack Μ., Kim Copeland, Jon Frederick, et al.. (2005). Spinal lesion level in spina bifida: a source of neural and cognitive heterogeneity. Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics. 102(3). 268–279. 160 indexed citations
6.
Dennis, Maureen, Kim Edelstein, Kim Copeland, et al.. (2005). Space-Based Inhibition of Return in Children With Spina Bifida.. Neuropsychology. 19(4). 456–465. 30 indexed citations
7.
Hannay, H. Julia, et al.. (2005). Attention Problems and Executive Functions in Children With Spina Bifida and Hydrocephalus. Child Neuropsychology. 11(3). 265–283. 94 indexed citations
8.
Dennis, Maureen, Kim Edelstein, Ross Hetherington, et al.. (2004). Neurobiology of perceptual and motor timing in children with spina bifida in relation to cerebellar volume. Brain. 127(6). 1292–1301. 59 indexed citations
9.
Dennis, Maureen, Kim Edelstein, Kim Copeland, et al.. (2004). Covert orienting to exogenous and endogenous cues in children with spina bifida. Neuropsychologia. 43(6). 976–987. 43 indexed citations
10.
Edelstein, Kim, Maureen Dennis, Kim Copeland, et al.. (2004). Motor learning in children with spina bifida: Dissociation between performance level and acquisition rate. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 10(6). 877–887. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026