Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim. The network helps show where Kim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kim. Kim is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kim, et al.. (2019). Nurses’ Work-Life Balance and Parenting Experience. Occupational Health Nursing. 28(1). 53–63.6 indexed citations
3.
Kim, et al.. (2016). Is National Identity an Obstacle to the Acceptance of Foreign Immigrants as Kookmin (Korean Citizen). 39(4). 29–59.2 indexed citations
4.
Kim, et al.. (2016). Selection of Energy Conservation Measures for Building Energy Retrofit. 16(6). 5–12.1 indexed citations
5.
Kim, et al.. (2016). Organizational culture and innovation. 2015. 829–832.4 indexed citations
6.
Kim, et al.. (2015). The Analysis of Life Cycle Cost and Cooling Water Circulating Pump Energy Saving According to Variable Speed Pressure Differential Setpoint Control Strategy. 15(4). 37–43.2 indexed citations
7.
Kim, et al.. (2014). Performance Evaluation of Energy Reduction of Light Shelf Applying Punching Plate. 14(6). 5–13.
8.
Kim, et al.. (2014). Impact by Estimation Error of Hourly Horizontal Global Solar Radiation Models on Building Energy Performance Analysis. 14(2). 3–10.2 indexed citations
9.
Kim, et al.. (2014). The Rise and Fall of Social Networking Sites： A Comparative Study of Cyworld and Facebook. 4(3). 147–162.1 indexed citations
10.
Hwang, et al.. (2013). TV광고에서의 남성성 연구. 176–179.2 indexed citations
11.
Kim, et al.. (2013). 그림책에 나타난 아버지의 역할 연구. 434–437.
12.
Kim, et al.. (2012). A Comparison of Learning Cultures in Different Sizes and Types. 美中教育评论：A. 2(2). 206–222.5 indexed citations
13.
Kim, et al.. (2011). Mission as Business from A managerial perspective. 9(3). 151–171.1 indexed citations
14.
Kim, et al.. (2011). The Impact that Social Distance Perceived by SNS Affects Communication. 201–202.1 indexed citations
15.
Kim, et al.. (2011). Korean Movies about Diverse People in Korea.. 213–214.
16.
Kim, et al.. (2011). Corruption and Controlling strategies in Asian Countriesand Korea. 한국행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집. 2011. 1058–1083.1 indexed citations
17.
Yong, et al.. (2011). A Study on Adolescents' Suicidal Ideation and Relevant Variables. 324–324.4 indexed citations
18.
Kim, et al.. (2009). The exploratory study on exporting brand strategy. 10(4). 551–560.1 indexed citations
19.
Kim, et al.. (2008). A study on the preference of traditional color coordination according to Hanbok design. 52–57.1 indexed citations
20.
Kim, et al.. (2002). Regional Approach for River Management. 6(3). 287–305.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.