K.G. Chakraborty
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Theoretical and Computational Physics 32
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism 8
-
- Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence 11
- Complex Network Analysis Techniques 5
- Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics 3
-
- Quantum many-body systems 9
- Magnetic properties of thin films 8
- Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies 6
- Co-authors
- J.W. TuckerT. Morita
- Cited by
- Condensed Matter PhysicsStatistical and Nonlinear PhysicsAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Journals
- Physical review. B, Condensed matter (7 papers)Journal of Physics Condensed Matter (5 papers)Physics Letters A (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomJapanIndia
In The Last Decade
K.G. Chakraborty
28 papers receiving 292 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Condensed Matter Physics 336
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 140
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 197
- Mathematical Physics 33
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 36
Countries citing papers authored by K.G. Chakraborty
This map shows the geographic impact of K.G. Chakraborty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.G. Chakraborty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.G. Chakraborty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K.G. Chakraborty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.G. Chakraborty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.G. Chakraborty. The network helps show where K.G. Chakraborty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 2 scholars most cited alongside K.G. Chakraborty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 10 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 23 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1986 | 34 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 36 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1985 | 24 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1984 | 15 | |
| 15 | 1984 | 37 | |
| 16 | 1979 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1979 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1978 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1976 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1976 | 14 |
About K.G. Chakraborty
K.G. Chakraborty is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (32 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (11 papers), Quantum many-body systems (9 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (8 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (8 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (6 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (5 papers) and Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (336 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (140 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (197 citations). K.G. Chakraborty has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and India. Frequent co-authors include J.W. Tucker and T. Morita. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter and Physics Letters A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.