Kerrigan Beaver

568 citations
14 papers · 254 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Kerrigan Beaver

14 papers receiving 249 citations

Peers

Kerrigan Beaver
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Infectious Diseases 167
  • General Health Professions 120
  • Health 32
  • Epidemiology 94
  • Social Psychology 48
Replace Courtney Caiola with:
Courtney Caiola United States
Mina Kazemi Canada
James R. Watson Canada
Michael Sobota Canada
Denise Jaworsky Canada
S. Raquel Ramos United States
LaVerne Monette Canada
Jay Koornstra Canada
Angela Bowen United States
Fatimah Jackson-Best Canada
Kerrigan Beaver relative to Courtney Caiola United States Courtney Caiola's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Courtney Caiola · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kerrigan Beaver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kerrigan Beaver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kerrigan Beaver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kerrigan Beaver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kerrigan Beaver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kerrigan Beaver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kerrigan Beaver. The network helps show where Kerrigan Beaver may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kerrigan Beaver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kerrigan Beaver Line = papers co-authored together Kerrigan Beaver links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201645
2 201943
3 201536
4 201832
5 201726
6 201616
7 201714
8 201913
9 202010
10 20148
11 20095
12 20203
13 20212
14 20181

About Kerrigan Beaver

Kerrigan Beaver is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology and Health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 254 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (7 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (4 papers), HIV-related health complications and treatments (3 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 papers) and Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (167 citations), General Health Professions (120 citations), Health (32 citations), Epidemiology (94 citations) and Social Psychology (48 citations). Kerrigan Beaver has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mona Loutfy, Alexandra de Pokomandy, Angela Kaida, Valerie Nicholson, Allison Carter, Kath Webster, Robert S. Hogg, Karène Proulx‐Boucher, Nadia O’Brien and Saara Greene. Their work appears in journals such as International Indigenous Policy Journal, International Journal for Population Data Science, Women & Health, Journal of the International AIDS Society and Social Science & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact