Keren Gorodeisky

415 total citations
13 papers, 136 citations indexed

About

Keren Gorodeisky is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Visual Arts and Performing Arts. According to data from OpenAlex, Keren Gorodeisky has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 136 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Philosophy, 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 4 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts. Recurrent topics in Keren Gorodeisky's work include Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (6 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (4 papers) and Visual Culture and Art Theory (4 papers). Keren Gorodeisky is often cited by papers focused on Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (6 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (4 papers) and Visual Culture and Art Theory (4 papers). Keren Gorodeisky collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Keren Gorodeisky's co-authors include Eric Marcus and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism.

In The Last Decade

Keren Gorodeisky

11 papers receiving 130 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Keren Gorodeisky United States	6	96	77	40	22	10	13	136
Nick Riggle United States	8	68 0.7×	51 0.7×	27 0.7×	28 1.3×	17 1.7×	14	134
James Shelley United States	7	66 0.7×	65 0.8×	25 0.6×	28 1.3×	12 1.2×	15	117
Eileen John United Kingdom	4	36 0.4×	34 0.4×	15 0.4×	18 0.8×	7 0.7×	15	82
Elisabeth Schellekens Sweden	7	47 0.5×	90 1.2×	55 1.4×	36 1.6×	5 0.5×	16	160
Íngrid Vendrell Ferran Germany	7	40 0.4×	36 0.5×	35 0.9×	11 0.5×	26 2.6×	35	118
Luca Ferrero United States	7	104 1.1×	77 1.0×	32 0.8×	4 0.2×	8 0.8×	17	146
Samantha Matherne United States	9	95 1.0×	45 0.6×	64 1.6×	21 1.0×	5 0.5×	20	168
Rachel Zuckert United States	6	134 1.4×	43 0.6×	29 0.7×	12 0.5×	18 1.8×	19	202
Robert R. Clewis United States	6	39 0.4×	18 0.2×	17 0.4×	8 0.4×	23 2.3×	21	110
Angelica Nuzzo United States	7	71 0.7×	13 0.2×	16 0.4×	10 0.5×	27 2.7×	40	111

Countries citing papers authored by Keren Gorodeisky

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keren Gorodeisky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keren Gorodeisky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keren Gorodeisky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keren Gorodeisky

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keren Gorodeisky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keren Gorodeisky. The network helps show where Keren Gorodeisky may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keren Gorodeisky

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keren Gorodeisky. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keren Gorodeisky based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keren Gorodeisky. Keren Gorodeisky is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Gorodeisky, Keren. (2025). Understanding Each Other: A Beauvoirian Second Person Approach. European Journal of Philosophy. 33(4). 1518–1539. 1 indexed citations

2.

Gorodeisky, Keren. (2025). Speaking with Each Other: A Beauvoirian Model. Philosophy and Rhetoric. 58(1). 81–94. 1 indexed citations

3.

Gorodeisky, Keren. (2022). Aesthetic Value: The View from Here. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 81(1). 85–86.

4.

Gorodeisky, Keren & Eric Marcus. (2022). Aesthetic knowledge. Philosophical Studies. 179(8). 2507–2535. 7 indexed citations

5.

Gorodeisky, Keren. (2021). Must Reasons Be Either Theoretical or Practical? Aesthetic Criticism and Appreciative Reasons. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 100(2). 313–329. 2 indexed citations

6.

Gorodeisky, Keren. (2019). The authority of pleasure. Noûs. 55(1). 199–220. 24 indexed citations

7.

Gorodeisky, Keren. (2019). On Liking Aesthetic Value. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 102(2). 261–280. 25 indexed citations

8.

Gorodeisky, Keren & Eric Marcus. (2018). Aesthetic Rationality. The Journal of Philosophy. 115(3). 113–140. 41 indexed citations

9.

Gorodeisky, Keren. (2018). Rationally Agential Pleasure? A Kantian Proposal. Oxford University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations

10.

Gorodeisky, Keren. (2017). Value First: Comments on Mohan Matthen's ‘The Pleasure of Art’. Australasian Philosophical Review. 1(1). 79–84. 1 indexed citations

11.

Gorodeisky, Keren. (2011). A Tale of Two Faculties. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 51(4). 415–436. 6 indexed citations

12.

Gorodeisky, Keren. (2011). (Re)encountering Individuality: Schlegel's Romantic Imperative as a Response to Nihilism. Inquiry. 54(6). 567–590. 1 indexed citations

13.

Gorodeisky, Keren. (2010). A New Look at Kant's View of Aesthetic Testimony. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 50(1). 53–70. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact