Kenneth Dean

623 citations
33 papers · 343 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Kenneth Dean

29 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

Kenneth Dean
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Geography, Planning and Development 57
  • Space and Planetary Science 9
  • Sociology and Political Science 234
  • Geology 30
  • Cultural Studies 43
Replace Richard Kurin with:
Richard Kurin United States
Beatriz Colomina United States
Chiara Bortolotto France
Jean Davallon France
Conal McCarthy New Zealand
Daniel Bos United Kingdom
Anthony Vidler United States
Natalia Grincheva Australia
Erkki Huhtamo United States
Clare Melhuish United Kingdom
Kenneth Dean relative to Richard Kurin United States Richard Kurin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Richard Kurin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth Dean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth Dean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth Dean. The network helps show where Kenneth Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Kenneth Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kenneth Dean Line = papers co-authored together Kenneth Dean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201966
2 200361
3 199848
4 199540
5 201818
6 202011
7
First & Last Emperors: The Absolute State and the Body of the Despot
199211
8 201010
9 20109
10 19948
11 20217
12 19947
13 20126
14 19955
15 20194
16 19984
17 20224
18 20204
19 20163
20
Chinese Epigraphy in Singapore 1819-1911 = Xinjiapo Hua wen ming ke hui bian 1819-1911
20173

About Kenneth Dean

Kenneth Dean is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 33 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (13 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (10 papers), Japanese History and Culture (10 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (8 papers), Asian Studies and History (6 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (5 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (3 papers) and Philippine History and Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (57 citations), Space and Planetary Science (9 citations), Sociology and Political Science (234 citations), Geology (30 citations) and Cultural Studies (43 citations). Kenneth Dean has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, Germany and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Brian Massumi, Peter van der Veer, Yingwei Yan, Chen‐Chieh Feng, Yi‐Chen Wang, Lily Kong, Yichen Wang, Arthur Tay, Jonathan P. Shepherd and Meng Yu. Their work appears in journals such as Religions, Global Networks, Cultural Geographies, Sociology of Religion and Journal of Cultural Heritage.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact