Kenneth C. Scott-Brown

627 total citations
29 papers, 427 citations indexed

About

Kenneth C. Scott-Brown is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Human-Computer Interaction. According to data from OpenAlex, Kenneth C. Scott-Brown has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 427 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 10 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 8 papers in Human-Computer Interaction. Recurrent topics in Kenneth C. Scott-Brown's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (5 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (4 papers). Kenneth C. Scott-Brown is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (5 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (4 papers). Kenneth C. Scott-Brown collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Germany. Kenneth C. Scott-Brown's co-authors include Vera Kempe, Timothy R. Jordan, Sharon M. Thomas, Benjamin W. Tatler, Geoffrey R. Patching, H. S. Orbach, Andrea M. Philipp, Mathieu Declerck, John T. Egan and P. George Lovell and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Computers in Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Kenneth C. Scott-Brown

27 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers

Kenneth C. Scott-Brown

DEP

ECP

CVPR

Marcus R. Watson Canada

Shannon Ross‐Sheehy United States

Kai Hamburger Germany

Anna Ma-Wyatt Australia

Annabelle Goujon France

John Christie Canada

Joan Stiles-Davis United States

Inês Bramão Sweden

Qiufang Fu China

JM Findlay United Kingdom

Marcus R. Watson Canada

Kenneth C. Scott-Brown

234 ×0.9

97 ×0.6

DEP

160 ×2.2

ECP

38 ×0.9

CVPR

81 ×2.3

Citations per year, relative to Kenneth C. Scott-Brown Kenneth C. Scott-Brown (= 1×) peers Marcus R. Watson

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth C. Scott-Brown

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth C. Scott-Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth C. Scott-Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth C. Scott-Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth C. Scott-Brown

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth C. Scott-Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth C. Scott-Brown. The network helps show where Kenneth C. Scott-Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth C. Scott-Brown

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth C. Scott-Brown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth C. Scott-Brown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth C. Scott-Brown. Kenneth C. Scott-Brown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Scott-Brown, Kenneth C., et al.. (2024). ‘It's Just Not Safe’: Gender-Based Harassment and Toxicity Experiences of Women in Esports. Games and Culture. 5 indexed citations

Falconer, Ruth E., et al.. (2020). Training air traffic controllers through digital mobile applications versus traditional methods. Abertay Research Portal (Abertay University).

Scott-Brown, Kenneth C., et al.. (2019). Their Memory: Exploring Veterans’ Voices, Virtual Reality and Collective Memory. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research. 12(2). 1 indexed citations

Renaud, Karen, et al.. (2018). Designing authentication with seniors in mind. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde). 1 indexed citations

Kempe, Vera, et al.. (2017). Can monolinguals be like bilinguals? Evidence from dialect switching. Cognition. 170. 164–178. 34 indexed citations

Scott-Brown, Kenneth C., et al.. (2017). On the Factors Causing Processing Difficulty of Multiple-Scene Displays. i-Perception. 8(2). 42 indexed citations

Egan, John T., et al.. (2016). Edge enhancement improves disruptive camouflage by emphasising false edges and creating pictorial relief. Scientific Reports. 6(1). 38274–38274. 28 indexed citations

Fernández‐Gutiérrez, Fabiola, Santiago Martínez, Benjamin F. Cox, et al.. (2015). Comparative ergonomic workflow and user experience analysis of MRI versus fluoroscopy-guided vascular interventions: an iliac angioplasty exemplar case study. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 10(10). 1639–1650. 7 indexed citations

Scott-Brown, Kenneth C., et al.. (2014). No evidence for reduced Simon cost in elderly bilinguals and bidialectals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 26(6). 640–648. 86 indexed citations

10.

Rusconi, Elena, et al.. (2014). Neuroscience perspectives on security. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8. 996–996. 1 indexed citations

11.

Declerck, Mathieu, et al.. (2014). Cognitive cost of switching between standard and dialect varieties. Abertay Research Portal (Abertay University). 1 indexed citations

12.

Hibbard, Paul B., et al.. (2014). Depth Perception Not Found in Human Observers for Static or Dynamic Anti-Correlated Random Dot Stereograms. PLoS ONE. 9(1). e84087–e84087. 20 indexed citations

13.

Scott-Brown, Kenneth C., et al.. (2013). Do older Gaelic-English bilinguals show an advantage in inhibitory control?. Cognitive Science. 35(35). 782–787. 8 indexed citations

14.

Scott-Brown, Kenneth C., et al.. (2013). Behavioral biases when viewing multiplexed scenes: scene structure and frames of reference for inspection. Frontiers in Psychology. 4. 624–624. 14 indexed citations

15.

Scott-Brown, Kenneth C., et al.. (2012). The meaning of graphs: scatterplots as a test-bed for theories of object-hood. 34. 381–398. 1 indexed citations

16.

Scott-Brown, Kenneth C., et al.. (2012). Service–Please: an interactive healthy eating serious game application for tablet computer. Electronic workshops in computing. 4 indexed citations

17.

Martínez, Santiago, et al.. (2010). Using virtual agents to cue observer attention. 7–12. 5 indexed citations

18.

Martínez, Santiago, et al.. (2010). Using Virtual Agents to Cue Observer Attention Assessment of the impact of agent animation. 7–12. 2 indexed citations

19.

Jordan, Timothy R., Sharon M. Thomas, Geoffrey R. Patching, & Kenneth C. Scott-Brown. (2003). Assessing the importance of letter pairs in initial, exterior, and interior positions in reading.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 29(5). 883–893. 67 indexed citations

20.

Scott-Brown, Kenneth C. & Timothy R. Jordan. (2000). A low-cost, accurate method of producing large quantities of digitally filtered images. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 32(3). 458–463. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact