John Christie
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Co-authors
- Raymond M. KleinChris RordenBen DavisKristine A. PeaceJonathan M. FawcettDarren C. McKeeMatthew D. HilcheyMikael Parkvall
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (18 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (14 papers)Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
John Christie
29 papers receiving 692 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Cognitive Neuroscience 575
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 132
- Social Psychology 117
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 92
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 56
Countries citing papers authored by John Christie
This map shows the geographic impact of John Christie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Christie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Christie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Christie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Christie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Christie. The network helps show where John Christie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Christie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Christie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Christie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Christie. John Christie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 40 | |
| 8 | 91 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 79 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | 41 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 75 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 94 |
About John Christie
John Christie is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 713 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (18 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (14 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (575 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (132 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (92 citations). John Christie has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Raymond M. Klein, Raymond M. Klein, Chris Rorden, Ben Davis, Kristine A. Peace, Jonathan M. Fawcett, Darren C. McKee, Matthew D. Hilchey, Mikael Parkvall and Ana B. Chica. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Psychological Science and Experimental Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.