Kelly Ritter
- Education top 10%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Genetics
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 5%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Ceib PhillipsCarroll‐Ann TrotmanPaul Kei MatsudaJulian J. FarawayU. JoosAndré BüchterU. Stratmann
- Topics
- Artistic and Creative Research (9 papers)Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (6 papers)Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kelly Ritter
22 papers receiving 189 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Education 62
- Literature and Literary Theory 60
- Genetics 58
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 39
- Surgery 37
Countries citing papers authored by Kelly Ritter
This map shows the geographic impact of Kelly Ritter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kelly Ritter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kelly Ritter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kelly Ritter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kelly Ritter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kelly Ritter. The network helps show where Kelly Ritter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kelly Ritter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kelly Ritter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kelly Ritter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kelly Ritter. Kelly Ritter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Making (Collective) Memory Public: WPA Histories in Dialogue | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | Reframing the Subject: Postwar Instructional Film and Class-Conscious Literacies | 0 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | Who Owns School?: Authority, Students, and Online Discourse | 3 |
| 9 | Creative Writing in the Twenty-First Century | 2 |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | Yours, Mine and Ours: Triangulating Plagiarism, Forgery, and Identity | 3 |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | Can It Really Be Taught?: Resisting Lore in Creative Writing Pedagogy | 17 |
| 15 | Extra-Institutional Agency and the Public Value of the WPA | 0 |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 55 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About Kelly Ritter
Kelly Ritter is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Literature and Literary Theory and Linguistics and Language, having authored 32 papers that have together received 249 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Artistic and Creative Research (9 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (6 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (39 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (60 citations) and Health Informatics (6 citations). Kelly Ritter has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ceib Phillips, Carroll‐Ann Trotman, Paul Kei Matsuda, Julian J. Faraway, U. Joos, André Büchter and U. Stratmann. Their work appears in journals such as College Composition and Communication, The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal and College English.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.