Keith Turner

1.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
35 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Keith Turner is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Geology and Environmental Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Keith Turner has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 6 papers in Geology and 4 papers in Environmental Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Keith Turner's work include 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (6 papers), Landslides and related hazards (6 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (4 papers). Keith Turner is often cited by papers focused on 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (6 papers), Landslides and related hazards (6 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (4 papers). Keith Turner collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Keith Turner's co-authors include Geoffrey D. Thyne, Cüneyt Güler, John E. McCray, John Kemeny, H.R.G.K. Hack, S. Slob, Brian Norton, W. B. Whalley, Alexander Robertson and Ahmet Karakaş and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Computers & Geosciences and Hydrogeology Journal.

In The Last Decade

Keith Turner

31 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Evaluation of graphical and multivariate statistical meth... 2002 2026 2010 2018 2002 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Keith Turner United States 8 725 669 375 266 244 35 1.3k
Faisal K. Zaidi Saudi Arabia 21 859 1.2× 963 1.4× 592 1.6× 214 0.8× 46 0.2× 63 1.5k
Marina De Maio Italy 18 659 0.9× 576 0.9× 444 1.2× 171 0.6× 23 0.1× 46 1.2k
Habes Ghrefat Saudi Arabia 20 372 0.5× 304 0.5× 443 1.2× 618 2.3× 30 0.1× 69 1.7k
Alaa A. Masoud Egypt 20 239 0.3× 592 0.9× 288 0.8× 311 1.2× 33 0.1× 55 1.2k
José Alfredo Ramos‐Leal Mexico 18 417 0.6× 465 0.7× 262 0.7× 103 0.4× 21 0.1× 80 1.0k
Mohammad Nakhaei Iran 23 555 0.8× 692 1.0× 564 1.5× 133 0.5× 14 0.1× 70 1.4k
Séverin Pistre France 22 449 0.6× 729 1.1× 439 1.2× 47 0.2× 23 0.1× 75 1.4k
Evangelos Tziritis Greece 19 641 0.9× 823 1.2× 745 2.0× 252 0.9× 14 0.1× 51 1.5k
Rachida Bouhlila Tunisia 20 783 1.1× 826 1.2× 510 1.4× 115 0.4× 14 0.1× 71 1.4k
Changlai Xiao China 19 390 0.5× 356 0.5× 581 1.5× 95 0.4× 16 0.1× 89 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Turner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Turner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Turner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Turner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Turner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Turner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Turner. The network helps show where Keith Turner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith Turner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith Turner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith Turner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keith Turner. Keith Turner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Turner, Keith. (2015). A Review of U.S. Patents in the Field of Organic Process Development Published during January and February 2015. Organic Process Research & Development. 19(7). 778–792.
2.
Turner, Keith. (2015). A Review of U.S. Patents in the Field of Organic Process Development Published During October to November 2014. Organic Process Research & Development. 19(5). 561–575. 2 indexed citations
3.
Turner, Keith. (2015). A Review of U.S. Patents in the Field of Organic Process Development Published during August and September 2014. Organic Process Research & Development. 19(2). 329–343.
4.
Duncan, Sylvia H., Martin Reid, Louise Cantlay, et al.. (2013). Correction: Expression of Cellulosome Components and Type IV Pili within the Extracellular Proteome of Ruminococcus flavefaciens 007. PLoS ONE. 8(12). 4 indexed citations
5.
Turner, Keith. (2012). A Review of U.S. Patents in the Field of Organic Process Development Published During December 2011 and January 2012. Organic Process Research & Development. 16(5). 727–740. 7 indexed citations
7.
Turner, Keith. (2011). A Review of U.S. Patents in the Field of Organic Process Development Published During June and July 2011. Organic Process Research & Development. 15(6). 1222–1234. 1 indexed citations
8.
Turner, Keith. (2010). Review of U.S. Patents in the Field of Organic Process Development Published During February and March 2010. Organic Process Research & Development. 14(4). 759–769. 4 indexed citations
9.
Turner, Keith. (2009). A Review of U.S. Patents in the Field of Organic Process Development Published During December 2008 and January 2009. Organic Process Research & Development. 13(3). 381–390. 5 indexed citations
10.
Turner, Keith. (2007). A Review of U.S. Patents in the Field of Organic Process Development Published Between January and March 2007. Organic Process Research & Development. 11(4). 663–673. 1 indexed citations
11.
Kemeny, John, Brian Norton, & Keith Turner. (2006). Rock slope stability analysis utilizing ground-based LIDAR and digital image processing. 24(3). 15 indexed citations
12.
Turner, Keith. (2006). A Review of U.S. Patents in the Field of Organic Process Development Published during January and February 2006. Organic Process Research & Development. 10(3). 381–390. 1 indexed citations
13.
Slob, S., et al.. (2005). A METHOD FOR AUTOMATED DISCONTINUITY ANALYSIS OF ROCK SLOPES WITH 3D LASER SCANNING.. University of Twente Research Information. 43 indexed citations
14.
Turner, Keith. (2005). A Review of U.S. Patents in the Field of Organic Process Development Published during November and December 2004. Organic Process Research & Development. 9(3). 235–243. 1 indexed citations
15.
Turner, Keith. (2004). A Review of U.S. Patents in the Field of Organic Process Development Published during July and August 2004. Organic Process Research & Development. 8(6). 823–833. 1 indexed citations
16.
Turner, Keith. (2003). A Review of U.S. Patents in the Field of Organic Process Development Published during April to July 2003. Organic Process Research & Development. 7(6). 784–793. 2 indexed citations
17.
Slob, S., H.R.G.K. Hack, & Keith Turner. (2002). AN APPROACH TO AUTOMATE DISCONTINUITY MEASUREMENTS OF ROCK FACES USING LASER SCANNING TECHNIQUES. University of Twente Research Information. 87–94. 37 indexed citations
18.
Turner, Keith. (2000). A Review of U.S. Patents in the Field of Organic Process Development Published during April to July, 2000. Organic Process Research & Development. 4(6). 450–459. 1 indexed citations
19.
Turner, Keith. (1998). Comment on “An Ecofriendly Catalytic Route for the Preparation of Perfumery Grade Methyl Anthranilate from Anthranilic Acid and Methanol”. Organic Process Research & Development. 2(6). 431–431. 1 indexed citations
20.
Graham, N.B., et al.. (1957). 987. The chemistry of fungi. Part XXIX. The degradation of di- and tetra-hydrosclerotiorin with alkali. Journal of the Chemical Society (Resumed). 4924–4924. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026