Keith Moffat

165 papers receiving 11.9k citations

Hit Papers

Management of multimorbidity using a patient-centred care model: a pragmatic cluster-randomised trial of the 3D approach 2018 · 267 citations
267201820262020202350100150200250

Peers

Keith Moffat
Comparison fields: 5 of 171
  • Structural Biology 458
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 4.3k
  • Molecular Biology 8.2k
  • Plant Science 4.0k
  • Cell Biology 1.7k
Replace Ilme Schlichting with:
Ilme Schlichting Germany
So Iwata Japan
Werner Kühlbrandt Germany
Zbigniew Dauter United States
M.R. Sawaya United States
Tomitake Tsukihara Japan
G.N. Phillips United States
Richard Neutze Sweden
Martin Caffrey United States
Douglas C. Rees United States
Keith Moffat relative to Ilme Schlichting Germany Ilme Schlichting's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Ilme Schlichting · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Moffat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Moffat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Moffat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Moffat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Moffat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Moffat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Moffat. The network helps show where Keith Moffat may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith Moffat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Moffat Line = papers co-authored together Keith Moffat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20241
3 202020
4 201644
5 2015206
6 201442
7 2012114
8 201264
9 20119
10 20110
11 201062
12 200876
13 2005210
14 200453
15 200414
16 200241
17 200094
18 199728
19 19952
20 1989136

About Keith Moffat

Keith Moffat is a scholar working on Structural Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Radiation, Cell Biology and Molecular Biology, having authored 169 papers that have together received 12.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (55 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (49 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (49 papers), Light effects on plants (39 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (33 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (32 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (16 papers) and bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (458 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (4.3k citations), Molecular Biology (8.2k citations), Plant Science (4.0k citations) and Cell Biology (1.7k citations). Keith Moffat has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Möglich, Sean Crosson, Xiaojing Yang, Rebecca A. Ayers, V. Šrajer, Tsu-Yi Teng, Zhong Ren, Doletha M. E. Szebenyi, Sudarshan Rajagopal and Jane Kuk. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemistry, Journal of Molecular Biology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Applied Crystallography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026