Keith Langley

1.6k total citations
45 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Keith Langley is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Food Science and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Keith Langley has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 papers in Food Science and 8 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Keith Langley's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (21 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (9 papers) and Color Science and Applications (7 papers). Keith Langley is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (21 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (9 papers) and Color Science and Applications (7 papers). Keith Langley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Keith Langley's co-authors include Colin W. G. Clifford, David J. Fleet, Margaret L. Green, Johanna Bakker, Wendy E. Brown, Paul B. Hibbard, Peter J. Bex, J. Stephen Elmore, Deborah D. Roberts and David J. Mela and has published in prestigious journals such as Current Biology, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Keith Langley

45 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Keith Langley United Kingdom	21	483	374	191	153	134	45	1.2k
Xiong Jiang United States	30	165 0.3×	942 2.5×	101 0.5×	149 1.0×	82 0.6×	78	2.3k
David L. MacAdam United States	17	145 0.3×	674 1.8×	54 0.3×	105 0.7×	431 3.2×	59	2.3k
Shinya Yamamoto Japan	20	111 0.2×	1.1k 3.0×	91 0.5×	39 0.3×	55 0.4×	68	1.9k
E. Hita Spain	22	264 0.5×	336 0.9×	63 0.3×	24 0.2×	96 0.7×	89	1.6k
Isabelle Cayeux Switzerland	22	727 1.5×	349 0.9×	597 3.1×	92 0.6×	26 0.2×	48	2.0k
G. K. Essick United States	15	109 0.2×	1.0k 2.7×	79 0.4×	28 0.2×	17 0.1×	18	1.4k
Yuji Kawai Japan	22	640 1.3×	111 0.3×	99 0.5×	232 1.5×	32 0.2×	103	1.5k
Christelle Chrea Switzerland	10	465 1.0×	97 0.3×	291 1.5×	38 0.2×	7 0.1×	12	909
William T. Oliver United States	19	95 0.2×	452 1.2×	139 0.7×	402 2.6×	6 0.0×	86	1.7k
Zheng Zhou China	29	420 0.9×	460 1.2×	264 1.4×	61 0.4×	3 0.0×	88	2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Langley

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Langley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Langley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Langley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Langley

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Langley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Langley. The network helps show where Keith Langley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith Langley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith Langley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith Langley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keith Langley. Keith Langley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Langley, Keith & Stephen J. Anderson. (2010). The Riesz transform and simultaneous representations of phase, energy and orientation in spatial vision. Vision Research. 50(17). 1748–1765. 28 indexed citations

Langley, Keith, Véronique Lefebvre, & Stephen J. Anderson. (2009). Cascaded Bayesian processes: An account of bias in orientation perception. Vision Research. 49(20). 2453–2474. 2 indexed citations

Langley, Keith & Peter J. Bex. (2007). Contrast adaptation implies two spatiotemporal channels but three adapting processes.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 33(6). 1283–1296. 7 indexed citations

Bex, Peter J. & Keith Langley. (2007). The perception of suprathreshold contrast and fast adaptive filtering. Journal of Vision. 7(12). 1–1. 48 indexed citations

Langley, Keith & Stephen J. Anderson. (2006). Subtractive and divisive adaptation in visual motion computations. Vision Research. 47(5). 673–686. 14 indexed citations

Langley, Keith. (2005). Temporal adaptability and the inverse relationship to sensitivity: A parameter identification model. Spatial Vision. 18(4). 461–481. 5 indexed citations

Langley, Keith. (2002). Motion perception and motion estimation by total-least squares. Spatial Vision. 15(2). 171–190. 2 indexed citations

Clifford, Colin W. G., et al.. (2002). Contrast adaptation may enhance contrast discrimination. Spatial Vision. 16(1). 45–58. 40 indexed citations

Hibbard, Paul B., Mark F Bradshaw, Keith Langley, & Brian Rogers. (2002). The stereoscopic ansiotropy: Individual differences and underlying mechanisms.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 28(2). 469–476. 19 indexed citations

10.

Langley, Keith. (2002). A parametric account of contrast adaptation on contrast perception. Spatial Vision. 16(1). 77–93. 8 indexed citations

11.

Langley, Keith. (2001). Regularization in a neural model of motion perception. Vision Research. 41(17). 2273–2283. 1 indexed citations

12.

Langley, Keith. (2000). A model of motion adaptation and motion after-effects based upon principal component regression. Biological Cybernetics. 83(5). 407–417. 1 indexed citations

13.

Langley, Keith, David J. Fleet, & Paul B. Hibbard. (1999). Stereopsis from contrast envelopes. Vision Research. 39(14). 2313–2324. 27 indexed citations

14.

Langley, Keith. (1999). Computational models of coherent and transparent plaid motion1Portions of this research were presented at ARVO 1995, 1996, and the BMVC 1997.1. Vision Research. 39(1). 87–108. 9 indexed citations

15.

Hibbard, Paul B. & Keith Langley. (1998). Plaid slant and inclination thresholds can be predicted from components. Vision Research. 38(8). 1073–1084. 10 indexed citations

16.

Clifford, Colin W. G., Michael R. Ibbotson, & Keith Langley. (1997). An adaptive Reichardt detector model of motion adaptation in insects and mammals. Visual Neuroscience. 14(4). 741–749. 48 indexed citations

17.

Clifford, Colin W. G. & Keith Langley. (1996). Psychophysics of motion adaptation parallels insect electrophysiology. Current Biology. 6(10). 1340–1342. 46 indexed citations

18.

Fleet, David J. & Keith Langley. (1994). Computational analysis of non-Fourier motion. Vision Research. 34(22). 3057–3079. 80 indexed citations

19.

Mela, David J., et al.. (1994). No effect of oral or sample temperature on sensory assessment of fat content. Physiology & Behavior. 56(4). 655–658. 15 indexed citations

20.

Langley, Keith, et al.. (1986). Mechanical Properties of Cheese, Cheese Analogues and Protein Gels in Relation to Composition and Microstructure. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 5(1). 19. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact