Keith Gray
Impact in
-
- Healthcare Quality and Management
Papers in
-
- Health Services Management and Policy 1
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 1
-
- Healthcare Quality and Management 2
- Co-authors
- Michael Walsh (1 shared paper)Matthew Higgins (2 shared papers)Mark Burgess (1 shared paper)Wasim Baqir (1 shared paper)John Steer (1 shared paper)Tom Hartley (1 shared paper)Stephen C Bourke (1 shared paper)Fraser Birrell (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Health Organization and Management (1 paper)International Journal of Healthcare Management (1 paper)Clinical Medicine (1 paper)International Journal of Business Performance Management (1 paper)Nursing Management (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Keith Gray
10 papers receiving 38 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Research and Theory 2
- Health Information Management 4
- Health Informatics 1
- Marketing 6
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 6
Countries citing papers authored by Keith Gray
This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Gray more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Gray
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Gray. The network helps show where Keith Gray may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Keith Gray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 1 |
About Keith Gray
Keith Gray is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Education, having authored 10 papers that have together received 43 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Social Influence (2 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (2 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers), Health Services Management and Policy (1 paper), Nursing education and management (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (1 paper) and Business Strategy and Innovation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (2 citations), Health Information Management (4 citations), Health Informatics (1 citation), Marketing (6 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (6 citations). Keith Gray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Walsh, Matthew Higgins, Mark Burgess, Wasim Baqir, John Steer, Tom Hartley, Stephen C Bourke, Fraser Birrell, Nicola O’Brien and Tim Rapley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Health Organization and Management, International Journal of Healthcare Management, Clinical Medicine, International Journal of Business Performance Management and Nursing Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.