Keisuke Toyama
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology
- Neurology top 1%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 2%
- Co-authors
- Yukio KomatsuNobuhiko YamamotoTohru KurotaniKenji KosakaN. TsukaharaK. MatsunamiMitsuo KawatoKenji Doya
- Topics
- Neural dynamics and brain function (56 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (33 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Keisuke Toyama
96 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.1k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.9k
- Molecular Biology 682
- Neurology 576
- Developmental Neuroscience 309
Countries citing papers authored by Keisuke Toyama
This map shows the geographic impact of Keisuke Toyama's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keisuke Toyama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keisuke Toyama more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Keisuke Toyama
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keisuke Toyama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keisuke Toyama. The network helps show where Keisuke Toyama may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keisuke Toyama
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keisuke Toyama. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keisuke Toyama based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keisuke Toyama. Keisuke Toyama is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 60 | |
| 6 | A method for removal of eye movement artifacts from MEG -- Simultaneous current source estimation of eyes and cortical activities from MEG and EOG data | 0 |
| 7 | 178 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 50 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Keisuke Toyama
Keisuke Toyama is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Sensory Systems, having authored 105 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (56 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (33 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.1k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.9k citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (309 citations). Keisuke Toyama has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Yukio Komatsu, Nobuhiko Yamamoto, Tohru Kurotani, Kenji Kosaka, N. Tsukahara, K. Matsunami, Mitsuo Kawato, K. Matsunami, Kenji Doya and Hide Sakaguchi. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Cell and Neuron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.