Kees van Boven

48 papers receiving 517 citations

Peers

Kees van Boven
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Family Practice 31
  • Health Information Management 48
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 140
  • General Health Professions 198
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 24
Replace Karen Dearing with:
Karen Dearing United States
Inge Okkes Netherlands
E. van de Lisdonk Netherlands
Amy Binns–Calvey United States
Maurice Wood United States
Mirjam Harmsen Netherlands
Carmen Parrotta United States
L Stobbart United Kingdom
Michael A. Weingarten Israel
Eva Lena Strandberg Sweden
Kees van Boven relative to Karen Dearing United States Karen Dearing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Karen Dearing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kees van Boven

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kees van Boven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kees van Boven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kees van Boven more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kees van Boven

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kees van Boven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kees van Boven. The network helps show where Kees van Boven may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kees van Boven, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kees van Boven Line = papers co-authored together Kees van Boven links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201745
2 201142
3 201235
4 202131
5 201126
6 202123
7 202023
8 202119
9 201618
10
Defensive testing in Dutch family practice. Is the grass greener on the other side of the ocean?
199717
11 201217
12 201516
13 201114
14 201814
15 201713
16 202112
17 201712
18 201912
19 201611
20
The Belgian-Flemish version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ).
200210

About Kees van Boven

Kees van Boven is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Family Practice, General Health Professions, Philosophy and Pharmacy, having authored 49 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Disease Management Strategies (17 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (13 papers), Medical Coding and Health Information (9 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (8 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (5 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (4 papers), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (4 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (31 citations), Health Information Management (48 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (140 citations), General Health Professions (198 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (24 citations). Kees van Boven has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Tim olde Hartman, Chris van Weel, Henk Schers, H Lamberts, S. Oskam, Peter Lucassen, Annemarie Uijen, Hans Bor, Evelyn van Weel‐Baumgarten and Hiske van Ravesteijn. Their work appears in journals such as Family Practice, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and The Annals of Family Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026